Literature DB >> 26059082

Individual differences in the perceptual span during reading: evidence from the moving window technique.

Wonil Choi1, Matthew W Lowder2, Fernanda Ferreira2, John M Henderson2.   

Abstract

We report the results of an eye tracking experiment that used the gaze-contingent moving window technique to examine individual differences in the size of readers' perceptual span. Participants read paragraphs while the size of the rightward window of visible text was systematically manipulated across trials. In addition, participants completed a large battery of individual-difference measures representing two cognitive constructs: language ability and oculomotor processing speed. Results showed that higher scores on language ability measures and faster oculomotor processing speed were associated with faster reading times and shorter fixation durations. More interestingly, the size of readers' perceptual span was modulated by individual differences in language ability but not by individual differences in oculomotor processing speed, suggesting that readers with greater language proficiency are more likely to have efficient mechanisms to extract linguistic information beyond the fixated word.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye movements; Individual differences; Perceptual span; Reading

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059082     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0942-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Contributions of reader- and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Kazunaga Matsuki; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Toward Semantics in the Wild: Activation to Manipulable Nouns in Naturalistic Reading.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Wonil Choi; Vicky T Lai; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Is the author recognition test a useful metric for native and non-native English speakers? An item response theory analysis.

Authors:  Sean Patrick McCarron; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-05

5.  Reading Specific Small Saccades Predict Individual Phonemic Awareness and Reading Speed.

Authors:  Samy Rima; Michael C Schmid
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Reading Traits for Dynamically Presented Texts: Comparison of the Optimum Reading Rates of Dynamic Text Presentation and the Reading Rates of Static Text Presentation.

Authors:  Miki Uetsuki; Junji Watanabe; Hideyuki Ando; Kazushi Maruya
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.