Literature DB >> 26059075

Developing an Internet-Based Decision Aid for Women Choosing Between Vaginal Birth After Cesarean and Planned Repeat Cesarean.

Allison Shorten, Angela Fagerlin, Jessica Illuzzi, Holly P Kennedy, Hannah Lakehomer, Christian M Pettker, Allison Saran, Holly Witteman, Robin Whittemore.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In response to the call to develop strategies to engage women and providers in shared decision making, this article outlines a framework and process used to create an Internet-based decision aid about birth choices after previous cesarean. Recognizing the potential benefits of mobile health information technology, a paper-based decision aid was transformed into a secure, interactive Web site to meet the diverse needs of women and providers in this often challenging health care decision.
METHODS: An iterative and participatory research approach was used, engaging targeted users (pregnant women and pregnancy care providers) in the design and development process.
RESULTS: Women recommended that features and functions of the decision aid should include individualized information, trustworthy evidence, a secure and private site, quizzes to check knowledge, and a way to share values and preferences with their providers. Providers recommended individualized information for women, a process for women to share and document values and preferences with providers, and balanced, straightforward and complete information about the risks and benefits of each option. DISCUSSION: There is great potential for direct linkage between Internet-based decision aids and the electronic medical record. Work is currently underway to integrate and evaluate the Internet-based decision aid within busy practice settings to support shared decision making. This article is part of a special series of articles that address midwifery innovations in clinical practice, education, interprofessional collaboration, health policy, and global health.
© 2015 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth choices; internet decision aid; planned repeat cesarean; shared decision making; vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059075     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  8 in total

Review 1.  The effect of the Internet on decision-making during pregnancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayşe Taştekin Ouyaba; Selma İnfal Kesim
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  The Perspectives of Women and Their Health-Care Providers Regarding Using an ECA to Support Mode of Birth Decisions.

Authors:  Somphit Chinkam; Courtney Steer-Massaro; Ivan Herbey; Zhe Zhang; Timothy Bickmore; Allison Shorten
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  Barriers and Facilitators for the Use of a Medical Mobile App to Prevent Work-Related Risks in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Adeline V Velu; Monique Dm van Beukering; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Monique Hw Frings-Dresen; Ben Wj Mol; Joris Am van der Post; Marjolein Kok
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-08-22

4.  Flat trend of high caesarean section rates in Peru: A pooled analysis of 3,376,062 births from the national birth registry, 2012 to 2020.

Authors:  Hugo G Quezada-Pinedo; Kim N Cajachagua-Torres; Wilmer Cristobal Guzman-Vilca; Carla Tarazona-Meza; Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco; Luis Huicho
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2022-08

5.  Assessing the Views and Needs of People at High Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus for the Development of Mobile Health Apps: Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Beibei Duan; Zhe Liu; Weiwei Liu; Baohua Gou
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-07-08

6.  Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Kristin G Maki; Gratianne Vaisson; Jeanette Finderup; Krystina B Lewis; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Caroline Beaudoin; Sandrine Comeau; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Pelvic organ prolapse and treatment decisions- developing an online preference-sensitive tool to support shared decisions.

Authors:  Mette Hulbaek; Eva Knutz; Niels Teglhus Ebbesen; Jette Primdahl; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Regner Birkelund
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Women's and communities' views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.