Literature DB >> 26059073

Sorting Out the Health Risk in California's State-Based Marketplace.

Andrew B Bindman1, Denis Hulett1, Todd P Gilmer2, John Bertko3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the health risk of enrollees in California's state-based insurance marketplace (Covered California) by metal tier, region, month of enrollment, and plan. DATA SOURCE/STUDY
SETTING: 2014 Open-enrollment data from Covered California linked with 2012 hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visit records from statewide all-payer administrative databases. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System (CDPS) health risk scores derived from an individual's age and sex from the enrollment file and the diagnoses captured in the hospitalization and ED records. CDPS scores were standardized by setting the average to 1.00. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Among the 1,286,089 enrollees, 120,573 (9.4 percent) had at least one ED visit and/or a hospitalization in 2012. Higher risk enrollees chose plans with greater actuarial value. The standardized CDPS health risk score was 11 percent higher in the first month of enrollment (1.08; 99 percent CI: 1.07-1.09) than the last month (0.97; 99 percent CI: 0.97-0.97). Four of the 12 plans enrolled 91 percent of individuals; their average health risk scores were each within 3 percent of the marketplace's statewide average.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing health plans with a means to assess the health risk of their year 1 enrollees allowed them to anticipate whether they would receive or contribute payments to a risk-adjustment pool. After receiving these findings as a part of their negotiations with Covered California, health plans covering the majority of enrollees decreased their initially proposed 2015 rates, saving consumers tens of millions of dollars in potential premiums. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDPS health risk score; Health insurance marketplace; risk adjustment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059073      PMCID: PMC4722210          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  5 in total

1.  Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; standards related to reinsurance, risk corridors, and risk adjustment. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-03-23

2.  Measuring coding intensity in the Medicare Advantage program.

Authors:  Richard Kronick; W Pete Welch
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-17

3.  Supporting the needs of state health policy makers through university partnerships.

Authors:  David J Heller; Catherine Hoffman; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.265

4.  The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Sarah L Taubman; Heidi L Allen; Mira Bernstein; Jonathan H Gruber; Joseph P Newhouse; Eric C Schneider; Bill J Wright; Alan M Zaslavsky; Amy N Finkelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Improving health-based payment for Medicaid beneficiaries: CDPS.

Authors:  R Kronick; T Gilmer; T Dreyfus; L Lee
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2000
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.