Literature DB >> 26057993

Double concentric craniotomy: Safe and effective technique to achieve an en bloc resection of tumor involving both skull and duraa.

R Fornaro1, R Altieri2, D Garbossa1, F Zenga1, F Tartara1, A Ducati1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many tumors can involve the skull. Meningiomas are one of the most common intracranial neoplasms and invasion of the bone was described in 49% of cases. Other neoplastic lesions that can arise in bone, or involve it, are metastases, hemangiomas, aggressive cutis carcinomas and sarcomas. Radical excision is the golden standard of treatment but elevating a bone flap when the tumor involves both the skull and the dura could represent a technical challenge. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the technical details of our approach to remove a meningioma involving both skull and dura in a man aged 45. Patient underwent gross total excision and cranioplasty with PEEK custom made prothesis (Synthes™). DISCUSSION: We describe a double concentric craniotomy (DCC) technique where the tumor involving the bone is before left in situ, exposing normal dura, to perform afterwards en-bloc excision with minimal traction of brain surface.
CONCLUSION: DCC is a safe and effective technique to remove tumor involving both skull and dural structures under direct vision.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor; Concentric craniotomy; En bloc resection; Skull tumor

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057993      PMCID: PMC4486105          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

Many types of tumors can involve the skull. This neoplasms generally have a tendency to invade surroundings tissues. En bloc excision is mandatory but can represents a real technical challenge, expecially if tumor involves both the skull and the dura. Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms, second only to gliomas [1,2]. The meningiomas that secondarily involve the calvaria are 49% [3]. The term primary intraosseous meningioma (PIM) is used for an extradural meningioma that arises from the cap cells staying in the bone [4]. Generally they are diagnosed at the fifth decade [5]. PIMs of the calvaria originate either from the convexity or from the skull base. PIMs of the convexity are mostly slow-growing scalp lesions. They are painless and make no changes on the overlying skin [6]. They are mostly met at the periorbital and frontoparietal regions [7] and they are, generally, devoid of neurological findings [5]. PIMs have a tendency to be more malignant than intradural meningiomas [4]. Other tumors that can involve the skull are hemangiomas, metastases, many type of carcinoma and sarcoma arising directly by bone or by contiguous tissue (cutis, muscle, dura) and invading secondarily the skull. Total surgical excision should be the goal of treatment. The degree of resection is the most important factor correlating with recurrence and clinical long-term outcome [2]. The aggressive surgery that is needed in these cases could bring a large bone defects to fill. The removal of a tumor involving the skull and the intracranial space could present a technical challenge, especially if the tumor has a dural and/or brain attachment. With a standard craniotomy, the maneuver of separating the intraosseus portion of the tumor from the intracranial portion might produce hemorrhage, traction and injury to the underlying brain. We describe a technique where the tumor involving the bone is before left in situ, normal dura is exposed around the tumor, and the tumor can be afterwards removed en bloc with direct vision and minimally traction of the brain surface. We called this technique double concentric craniotomy (DCC).

Presentation of case

We report the technical neurosurgical details to perform a DCC. In our institute 8 patients, with different tumors involving both skull and dura, were treated with these technique. The histological examination of these patient’s specimens showed: atypical meningioma, PIM and anaplastic meningioma. All these patients underwent DCC with good oncological and neurological results. Below, we describe this technique used in the last patient treated, a man aged 45 with no neurological signs. Patient underwent DCC, total surgical excision of PIM and cranioplasty with PEEK custom made prothesis (Synthes™). A 45 years old man, B.V., presented to our Department of Neurosurgery with a mass arising from the right frontoparietal bone. He had not neurological signs and symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed a homogeneous expansive bone lesion at the right fronto-parietal region, without contrast enhancement. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion was hypointense on T1- and T2-weighted images with no contrast enhancement after intravenous gadolinium administration, but contrast enhancement was seen at the adjacent dura. In the differential diagnosis, were first considered a fibrous dysplasia and primary bone tumors. Patient undergoes tumor removal and cranioplasty with PEEK custom made prothesis (Synthes™). Under general anesthesia, patient was placed on the operating table in a pin head holder. The patient was positioned with the head turned approximately 30° toward the contralateral side, to expose the skull mass, with a pillow under the ipsilateral shoulder. A right pterional flap was elevated. The temporal muscle was splitted, the muscolar part that covering the tumor was left in situ for a completely radical resection and the remaining part was overturned. One only burr hole was performed laterally to the midline and we performed the first circle craniotomy around the lesion. Then, using the same burr hole, a second and more enlarged circular concentric craniotomy was performed. The bone ring resulting from the DCC was then removed (Fig 1). There was no tumor in the bone ring and the dura beneath the ring was not involved. The normal dura was opened around the tumor (Fig 2). The inner surface of the dura was amply involved by the tumor, and it was dissected by the underlying brain surface under direct vision thanks to the space guaranteed by bone ring removal. En-bloc excision was performed. The dural defect was repaired with pericardium bovinum patch and a PEEK custom made cranioplasty was performed (Fig 3). The patient was discharged home on the third postoperative day. The tumor was diagnosed as an atypical meningioma (WHO II).
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Discussion

Tumor involving many tissues should be resected en bloc for minimizing risk of seeding and recurrency. In fact, meningioma with calvarial hyperostosis is commonly associated with an increased rate of recurrence if limited bone resection is performed [8]. Although radical excision of tumor involving the skull is the gold standard of oncological treatment, elevating a bone flap when the tumor involves both the skull and the dura could be very hard and represents a technical challenge. With a standard craniotomy, it would be necessary to separate the tumor from the overlying infiltrated skull. This maneuver, done without direct vision, could produce hemorrhage and unwanted traction on the underlying brain surface [9]. We have described a technique, a DCC, that permit to expose the normal dura surrounding the tumor and permit the resection of entire specimen with a direct vision of the underlying brain. In our opinion DCC must be apply for all malignant tumors involving skull and surrounding tissues. All patients should be individually evaluated preoperatively for the need of plastic surgical repair. This technique worked very well for this case, a PIM. Michael et al. have described a similar technique for hemangioma resection [9]. Spennato et al. also have described a similar procedure for the removal of nail that was hammered in both the skull and the brain [10]. Sekhar et al. have utilized the concentric craniotomy technique for a fronto-orbital approach and Ibarra-de la Torre et al. for a posterior fossa craniotomy to protect the underlying dura and vascular structures [11,12].

Conclusion

We believe that DCC is an optimal alternative on standard technique because permits the total removal of tumor involving both skull and dura structures, minimizing tractions on the underlying brain and permitting the direct vision during the dissection.

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest.

Funding

No sponsor.

Author contribution

Fornaro Riccardo: study design. Altieri Roberto: writing. Garbossa Diego: data collection. Zenga Francesco: data analysis. Tartara Fulvio: study design. Ducati Alessandro: supervision.

Consent

There are no information in the text that permit to recognize the patient.
  9 in total

1.  Intraoperative patient-specific reconstruction of partial bone flap defects after convexity meningioma resection.

Authors:  Serge Marbacher; Daniel Coluccia; Ali Reza Fathi; Lukas Andereggen; Jürgen Beck; Javier Fandino
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 2.  Primary intraosseous meningioma: CT and MRI appearance.

Authors:  Nil Tokgoz; Yusuf A Oner; Memduh Kaymaz; Murat Ucar; Guldal Yilmaz; Turgut E Tali
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Intraosseous hemangioma of the skull with dural tail sign: radiologic features with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Maria Politi; Bernd F M Romeike; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Abdullah Nabhan; Tobias Struffert; Wolfgang Feiden; Wolfgang Reith
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Double concentric craniotomy for a craniocerebral penetrating nail. Case report and technical note.

Authors:  Pietro Spennato; Antonio Bocchetti; Giuseppe Mirone; Luciano Savarese; Domenico Squillante; Michele Rotondo; Massimo Natale
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-10

5.  Concentric craniotomy: removal of tumor involving the skull and the intracranial space.

Authors:  Berhanu H Michael; Tadese Kebede; Hagos Biluts; Getachew Affefa; Jacob Schneider; Stephen R Freidberg
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Primary intraosseous meningioma. Case report.

Authors:  T S Crawford; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; K O Lillehei
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Bone involvement predicts poor outcome in atypical meningioma.

Authors:  Darlene Gabeau-Lacet; Manish Aghi; Rebecca A Betensky; Fred G Barker; Jay S Loeffler; David N Louis
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Primary intraosseous meningioma.

Authors:  James B Elder; Roscoe Atkinson; Chi-Shing Zee; Thomas C Chen
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 9.  Molecular biology of gliomas: present and future challenges.

Authors:  R Altieri; A Agnoletti; F Quattrucci; D Garbossa; F M Calamo Specchia; M Bozzaro; R Fornaro; C Mencarani; M Lanotte; R Spaziante; A Ducati
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2014-04-08
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Detailed anatomy knowledge: first step to approach petroclival meningiomas through the petrous apex. Anatomy lab experience and surgical series.

Authors:  Roberto Altieri; Tetsuro Sameshima; Paolo Pacca; Emanuela Crobeddu; Diego Garbossa; Alessandro Ducati; Francesco Zenga
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Giant Calcified Cavernous Hemangioma Managed with Modified Double Concentric Craniotomy.

Authors:  Vikas Chandra Jha; Vishal Abhijit; Neera Jha; Sudhanshu Rewatkar; Vivek Sharan Sinha; Mohammad Shahnawaz Alam
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2021-05-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.