Literature DB >> 26057406

Motivating meta-awareness of mind wandering: A way to catch the mind in flight?

Claire M Zedelius1, James M Broadway2, Jonathan W Schooler2.   

Abstract

Given the negative effects of mind wandering on performance, it may be profitable to be aware of task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs) as they occur. The present study investigated whether motivating people to catch TUTs increases meta-awareness. We offered incentives for increased self-catching during reading. To enhance the veracity of these self-reports, we used a "bogus-pipeline" procedure; we convinced participants that their mental states were being covertly monitored using physiological measures. In reality, mind wandering was assessed covertly by a secondary task ("gibberish detection"), and overtly by experience sampling. The results showed that incentives increased the number of self-catches without increasing overall mind wandering. Moreover, both the bogus pipeline and the opportunity for incentives increased the validity of self-reports, evidenced by significantly increased correlations between self-caught and behaviorally assessed mind wandering. We discuss the relevance of this methodological approach for research on mind wandering and research building on introspective reports more generally.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bogus pipeline; Introspection; Meta-awareness; Mind wandering; Motivation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057406     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  8 in total

1.  The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Schubert; Gidon T Frischkorn; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-02

2.  Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Yana Weinstein; Henry J De Lima; Tim van der Zee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

3.  Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same, or distinct dimensions?

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Evan F Risko; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel L Schacter; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

4.  Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The awakening of the attention: Evidence for a link between the monitoring of mind wandering and prospective goals.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Daniel Smilek; Brandon C W Ralph; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-01-22

6.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09

Review 7.  Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Natali S Bozhilova; Giorgia Michelini; Jonna Kuntsi; Philip Asherson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  The plasticity of well-being: A training-based framework for the cultivation of human flourishing.

Authors:  Cortland J Dahl; Christine D Wilson-Mendenhall; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 12.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.