Literature DB >> 26057402

Does level of processing affect the transition from unconscious to conscious perception?

Anna Anzulewicz1, Dariusz Asanowicz2, Bert Windey3, Borysław Paulewicz4, Michał Wierzchoń2, Axel Cleeremans3.   

Abstract

Recently, Windey, Gevers, and Cleeremans (2013) proposed a level of processing (LoP) hypothesis claiming that the transition from unconscious to conscious perception is influenced by the level of processing imposed by task requirements. Here, we carried out two experiments to test the LoP hypothesis. In both, participants were asked to classify briefly presented pairs of letters as same or different, based either on the letters' physical features (a low-level task), or on a semantic rule (a high-level task). Stimulus awareness was measured by means of the four-point Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS). The results showed that low or moderate stimulus visibility was reported more frequently in the low-level task than in the high-level task, suggesting that the transition from unconscious to conscious perception is more gradual in the former than in the latter. Therefore, although alternative interpretations remain possible, the results of the present study fully support the LoP hypothesis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Awareness; Consciousness; Dichotomous; Gradual; Levels of processing; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057402     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  6 in total

1.  The Emergence of Visual Awareness: Temporal Dynamics in Relation to Task and Mask Type.

Authors:  Markus Kiefer; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-03

2.  Four-Dimensional Graded Consciousness.

Authors:  Jakub Jonkisz; Michał Wierzchoń; Marek Binder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-21

3.  Weak experiences sufficient for creating illusory figures that influence perception of actual lines.

Authors:  Simon Hviid Del Pin; Kristian Sandberg; Bo Martin Bibby; Morten Overgaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bringing action into the picture. How action influences visual awareness.

Authors:  Anna Anzulewicz; Justyna Hobot; Marta Siedlecka; Michał Wierzchoń
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise.

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Modelling visibility judgments using models of decision confidence.

Authors:  Manuel Rausch; Sebastian Hellmann; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.