Literature DB >> 26057027

Risk of alcohol abuse in urban versus rural DUI offenders.

Michael Malek-Ahmadi1, Lisa Degiorgio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research concerning driving under the influence (DUI) offenses in rural populations is scarce and has often been carried out in the context of substance abuse and illicit drug use. Although previous studies have suggested that rural individuals are more likely to abstain from alcohol use, recent trends suggest that alcohol and substance abuse problems in rural areas are occurring at rates similar to urban areas. It is possible that urban and rural DUI offenders may differ on psychological and behavioral characteristics associated with heavy alcohol consumption.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine alcohol use differences between urban and rural DUI offenders.
METHODS: Data from 11 066 DUI offenders in a Midwestern state were used for this study. The Alcohol subscale of the Driver Risk Inventory II was used to assess the risk of problem alcohol use.
RESULTS: Higher levels of alcohol risk were associated with rural DUI offenders after adjusting for several demographic variables and blood-alcohol content level at time of arrest [Medium Risk OR = 1.43, 95% CI: (1.20, 1.71); Problem Risk OR = 1.43, 95% CI: (1.19, 1.72); Severe Risk OR = 1.38, 95% CI: (1.14, 1.67)].
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that rural DUI offenders have a significantly greater risk of heavy alcohol use when compared to urban DUI offenders. Practical implications of these results suggest that evaluators and assessors should be aware of an increased likelihood of alcohol problems in rural DUI individuals relative to those in urban areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol abuse; alcohol risk; driving under the influence; driving while intoxicated

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057027     DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1043436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse        ISSN: 0095-2990            Impact factor:   3.829


  5 in total

1.  Impaired driving among rural female drug-involved offenders.

Authors:  J Matthew Webster; Martha Tillson; Megan F Dickson; Michele Staton
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  A descriptive analysis of drugged driving among rural DUI offenders.

Authors:  J Matthew Webster; Megan F Dickson; Michele Staton
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.491

3.  Community pharmacy staff perceptions on preventing alcohol and medication interactions in older adults.

Authors:  Faika Zanjani; Lauren Crook; Rachel Smith; Demetra Antimisiaris; Nancy Schoenberg; Catherine Martin; Richard Clayton
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

4.  A Comparison of Appalachian and Non-Appalachian Kentucky DUI Offenders.

Authors:  Megan F Dickson; Megan Kissel; J Matthew Webster
Journal:  J Appalach Health       Date:  2019-09-27

5.  College students' use of transportation networking companies: An opportunity to decrease substance-impaired driving.

Authors:  Jennifer M Whitehill; Molly Wilner; Suzanne Rataj; Megan A Moreno
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2018-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.