Literature DB >> 26056760

Development of a Best Evidence Statement for the Use of Pressure Therapy for Management of Hypertrophic Scarring.

Patricia A Sharp1, Brian Pan, Kevin P Yakuboff, Dawn Rothchild.   

Abstract

Pressure therapy has been considered standard, first-line intervention for the treatment of hypertrophic scars since its introduction in the 1960s. Although widely used, this scar management technique has historically been based on a wide array of anecdotal evidence as opposed to strong scientific support. Evidence has become more prevalent in recent years, necessitating a synthesis to develop an evidence-based clinical guideline. The clinical question was asked, "Among individuals with or at risk to develop active hypertrophic scars, does treatment with pressure therapy improve aesthetic and functional outcomes?" An evidence-based practice project was completed with aims to synthesize relevant literature to determine recommendations for the use of pressure therapy in individuals at risk for hypertrophic scars. A systematic search of the literature was conducted for the dates January 1950 to February 2014 of the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, Burntherapist.com, Cochrane Libraries, Ebsco, Google Scholar, OT Seeker, Ovid, MedLine, PEDro.org, Pubmed.gov, Pubmed Clinical Queries, and hand search of relevant articles through use of reference lists. Search terms included scar, hypertroph*, pressure therapy, compression therapy, pressure garment, burn, scald, trauma as well as MeSH terms cicatrix and hypertrophic. Articles were reviewed in terms of ability to answer the clinical question as well as strength of conclusions. A total of 45 articles were found and critiqued, 28 of which were relevant to the clinical question. Evidence strength ranged from level 1 to level 5. Results from the studies were synthesized to create clinical recommendations to guide treatment. Based on best available evidence, it is recommended that pressure therapy is utilized to decrease scar height and erythema that it is used for grafts and wounds requiring 14 to 21 days to heal, for 23 hours/day for 12 months, fit to achieve 20 to 30 mm Hg of pressure, fit by a skilled technician, and replaced every 2-3 months. In addition, it is not recommended that pressure therapy is used to treat abnormal pigmentation, nor used to hasten scar maturation. This literature search revealed insufficient evidence addressing the impact of pressure therapy on scar pliability. Among individuals with or at risk to develop active hypertrophic scars, treatment with pressure therapy does improve outcomes, particularly for aesthetic concerns including scar thickness and erythema. Applicability of research to practice: The practical treatment recommendations presented may improve consistency and efficacy of pressure therapy utilization at the point of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26056760     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  7 in total

Review 1.  Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.

Authors:  Jason Wasiak; Zephanie Tyack; Robert Ware; Nicholas Goodwin; Clovis M Faggion
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  A Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronan Sponge with Vitamin C Versus Placebo for Scar Reduction.

Authors:  Bardia Amirlak; Monali Mahedia; Nilay Shah
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-11

3.  Clinical Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Sponge with Zinc versus Placebo for Scar Reduction after Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Monali Mahedia; Nilay Shah; Bardia Amirlak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-11

Review 4.  The effectiveness of pressure therapy (15-25 mmHg) for hypertrophic burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Wei Ai; Jiang-Tao Liu; Sheng-Duo Pei; Yu Liu; De-Sheng Li; Hong-Ming Lin; Bin Pei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Clinical effects of transparent facial pressure masks: A literature review.

Authors:  Sander B Kant; Carlo Colla; Eric van den Kerckhove; Andrzej Piatkowski de Grzymala
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  A new treatment for reliable functional and esthetic outcome after local facial flap reconstruction: a transparent polycarbonate facial mask with silicone sheeting.

Authors:  Sander B Kant; Patrick I Ferdinandus; Eric Van den Kerckhove; Carlo Colla; René R W J Van der Hulst; Andrzej A Piatkowski de Grzymala; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05-31

7.  Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chatchai Pruksapong; Chairat Burusapat; Natthawoot Hongkarnjanakul
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.