Literature DB >> 26056321

Reliable implementation of evidence: a qualitative study of antenatal corticosteroid administration in Ohio hospitals.

Heather C Kaplan1, Susan N Sherman2, Charlena Cleveland3, Linda M Goldenhar3, Carole M Lannon3, Jennifer L Bailit4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antenatal corticosteroids (ANCS) reduce complications of preterm birth; however, not all eligible women receive them. Many hospitals and providers do not have the right processes and conditions to enable ANCS administration with high reliability. The objective of this study was to understand conditions that enable delivery of ANCS with high reliability among hospitals participating in an Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative (OPQC) ANCS project.
METHODS: We conducted focus groups and semistructured interviews with members of the OPQC project team (n=27) and other care providers (n=70) using a purposeful sample of 6 sites involved in the OPQC ANCS project. Participants including nurses (n=57), attending obstetricians (n=17), physician trainees (n=21) and certified nurse midwives (n=2) were asked to reflect on their experiences and to identify factors contributing to optimal use of ANCS. Focus groups and interviews were transcribed verbatim and were analysed by a multidisciplinary team using an iterative approach that combined inductive and deductive methods to identify and categorise themes.
RESULTS: Six major themes supporting reliable implementation of ANCS at these hospitals emerged including: (1) presence of a high reliability culture, (2) processes that emphasise high reliability, (3) timely and efficient administration process, (4) multiple disciplines are involved, (5) evidence of benefit supports ANCS use and (6) benefit is recognised at all levels of the care team.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify the key processes and supports needed to ensure delivery of ASCS with high reliability and are reinforced by implementation and reliability science. They are useful for foundation of the successful implementation of other evidence-based practices at high levels of reliability. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare quality improvement; Human factors; Implementation science; Obstetrics and gynecology; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26056321     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  4 in total

1.  Factors influencing appropriate use of interventions for management of women experiencing preterm birth: A mixed-methods systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Rana Islamiah Zahroh; Alya Hazfiarini; Katherine E Eddy; Joshua P Vogel; Ӧzge Tunçalp; Nicole Minckas; Fernando Althabe; Olufemi T Oladapo; Meghan A Bohren
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 11.613

2.  Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  E L Mc Goldrick; T Crawford; J A Brown; K M Groom; C A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  The variation of antenatal corticosteroids administration for the singleton preterm birth in China, 2017 to 2018.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Siyuan Jiang; Xuefeng Hu; Chao Chen; Yun Cao; Shoo Kim Lee; Jiang-Qin Liu
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 4.  The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review.

Authors:  Emma Coles; Julie Anderson; Margaret Maxwell; Fiona M Harris; Nicola M Gray; Gill Milner; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.