Literature DB >> 26056296

A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism for predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems.

Eric D Galbraith1, Adam C Martiny2.   

Abstract

It is widely recognized that the stoichiometry of nutrient elements in phytoplankton varies within the ocean. However, there are many conflicting mechanistic explanations for this variability, and it is often ignored in global biogeochemical models and carbon cycle simulations. Here we show that globally distributed particulate P:C varies as a linear function of ambient phosphate concentrations, whereas the N:C varies with ambient nitrate concentrations, but only when nitrate is most scarce. This observation is consistent with the adjustment of the phytoplankton community to local nutrient availability, with greater flexibility of phytoplankton P:C because P is a less abundant cellular component than N. This simple relationship is shown to predict the large-scale, long-term average composition of surface particles throughout large parts of the ocean remarkably well. The relationship implies that most of the observed variation in N:P actually arises from a greater plasticity in the cellular P:C content, relative to N:C, such that as overall macronutrient concentrations decrease, N:P rises. Although other mechanisms are certainly also relevant, this simple relationship can be applied as a first-order basis for predicting organic matter stoichiometry in large-scale biogeochemical models, as illustrated using a simple box model. The results show that including variable P:C makes atmospheric CO2 more sensitive to changes in low latitude export and ocean circulation than a fixed-stoichiometry model. In addition, variable P:C weakens the relationship between preformed phosphate and atmospheric CO2 while implying a more important role for the nitrogen cycle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; marine ecosystem; nutrients; phytoplankton; stoichiometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26056296      PMCID: PMC4500256          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423917112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

Review 1.  Glacial/interglacial variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  D M Sigman; E A Boyle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The evolutionary inheritance of elemental stoichiometry in marine phytoplankton.

Authors:  Antonietta Quigg; Zoe V Finkel; Andrew J Irwin; Yair Rosenthal; Tung-Yuan Ho; John R Reinfelder; Oscar Schofield; Francois M M Morel; Paul G Falkowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton.

Authors:  Christopher A Klausmeier; Elena Litchman; Tanguy Daufresne; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Dynamic model of flexible phytoplankton nutrient uptake.

Authors:  Juan A Bonachela; Michael Raghib; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Nutrient ratios as a tracer and driver of ocean biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Curtis Deutsch; Thomas Weber
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2012

Review 6.  Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993-2005: synthesis and future directions.

Authors:  P W Boyd; T Jickells; C S Law; S Blain; E A Boyle; K O Buesseler; K H Coale; J J Cullen; H J W de Baar; M Follows; M Harvey; C Lancelot; M Levasseur; N P J Owens; R Pollard; R B Rivkin; J Sarmiento; V Schoemann; V Smetacek; S Takeda; A Tsuda; S Turner; A J Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Impact of ocean phytoplankton diversity on phosphate uptake.

Authors:  Michael W Lomas; Juan A Bonachela; Simon A Levin; Adam C Martiny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ocean nutrient ratios governed by plankton biogeography.

Authors:  Thomas S Weber; Curtis Deutsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Phytoplankton in the ocean use non-phosphorus lipids in response to phosphorus scarcity.

Authors:  Benjamin A S Van Mooy; Helen F Fredricks; Byron E Pedler; Sonya T Dyhrman; David M Karl; Michal Koblízek; Michael W Lomas; Tracy J Mincer; Lisa R Moore; Thierry Moutin; Michael S Rappé; Eric A Webb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Phytoplankton community structure and the drawdown of nutrients and CO2 in the southern ocean

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  28 in total

1.  Interactions between growth-dependent changes in cell size, nutrient supply and cellular elemental stoichiometry of marine Synechococcus.

Authors:  Nathan S Garcia; Juan A Bonachela; Adam C Martiny
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Ocean stoichiometry, global carbon, and climate.

Authors:  Robert W Sterner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Patterns of deoxygenation: sensitivity to natural and anthropogenic drivers.

Authors:  Andreas Oschlies; Olaf Duteil; Julia Getzlaff; Wolfgang Koeve; Angela Landolfi; Sunke Schmidtko
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Linking regional shifts in microbial genome adaptation with surface ocean biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Catherine A Garcia; George I Hagstrom; Alyse A Larkin; Lucas J Ustick; Simon A Levin; Michael W Lomas; Adam C Martiny
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Deep ocean nutrients imply large latitudinal variation in particle transfer efficiency.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Jacob A Cram; Shirley W Leung; Timothy DeVries; Curtis Deutsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Generalized Stoichiometry and Biogeochemistry for Astrobiological Applications.

Authors:  Christopher P Kempes; Michael J Follows; Hillary Smith; Heather Graham; Christopher H House; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  What intrinsic and extrinsic factors explain the stoichiometric diversity of aquatic heterotrophic bacteria?

Authors:  Casey M Godwin; James B Cotner
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 11.217

8.  Variable inter and intraspecies alkaline phosphatase activity within single cells of revived dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Mathias Girault; Raffaele Siano; Claire Labry; Marie Latimier; Cécile Jauzein; Thomas Beneyton; Lionel Buisson; Yolanda Del Amo; Jean-Christophe Baret
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 11.217

9.  Interactions between Thermal Acclimation, Growth Rate, and Phylogeny Influence Prochlorococcus Elemental Stoichiometry.

Authors:  Adam C Martiny; Lanying Ma; Céline Mouginot; Jeremy W Chandler; Erik R Zinser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Temperature Dependence of Phytoplankton Stoichiometry: Investigating the Roles of Species Sorting and Local Adaptation.

Authors:  Gabriel Yvon-Durocher; Charlotte-Elisa Schaum; Mark Trimmer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.