Literature DB >> 26056056

The Impact of the Crown-Root Ratio on Survival of Abutment Teeth for Dentures.

S Tada1, P F Allen2, K Ikebe3, H Zheng4, A Shintani4, Y Maeda3.   

Abstract

Crown-root ratio (CRR) is commonly recorded when planning prosthodontic procedures. However, there is a lack of longitudinal clinical data evaluating the association between CRR and tooth survival. The aim of this longitudinal practice-based study was to assess the impact of CRR on the survival of abutment teeth for removable partial dentures (RPDs). Data were collected from 147 patients provided with RPDs at a dental hospital in Japan. In total, 236 clasp-retained RPDs and 856 abutment teeth were analyzed. Survival of abutment teeth was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox's proportional hazard (PH) regression. The Cox PH regression was used to assess the prognostic significance of initial CRR value with adjustments for clinically relevant factors, including age, sex, frequency of periodontal maintenance programs, occlusal support area, type of abutment tooth, status of endodontic treatment, and probing pocket depth. Abutment teeth were divided into 1 of 5 risk groups according to CRR: A (≤0.75), B (0.76-1.00), C (1.01-1.25), D (1.26-1.50) and E (≥1.51). The 7-year survival rate was 89.1% for group A, 85.9% for group B, 86.5% for group C, 76.9% for group D, and 46.7% for group E. The survival curves of groups A, B, and C were illustrated to be quite similar and favorable. The multivariable analysis treating CRR as a continuous variable allowed estimation of the hazard ratio at any specific CRR value. When CRR = 0.80 was set as a reference, the estimated hazard ratio was 0.58 for CRR = 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.91), 1.13 for CRR = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.93-1.37), 1.35 for CRR = 1.25 (95% CI, 1.02-1.80), 1.53 for CRR = 1.50 (95% CI, 1.15-2.08), or 1.95 for CRR = 2.00 (95% CI, 1.44-2.65). These practice-based longitudinal data provide information to improve the evidence-based prognosis of teeth in providing prosthodontic procedures. © International & American Associations for Dental Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical outcome; decision-making; evidence-based dentistry/ health care; prognosis; prosthetics dentistry/prosthodontics; removable prosthodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26056056     DOI: 10.1177/0022034515589710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  4 in total

1.  Inconsistency in the Crown-to-Root Ratios of Single-Rooted Premolars Measured by 2D and 3D Examinations.

Authors:  Hsiang-Hsi Hong; Heng-Liang Liu; Adrienne Hong; Pu Chao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comparison of tensile bond strength of ball attachments made of different materials to root canal dentin after chewing simulation.

Authors:  Ahmed Mostafa Abdelfattah Mohamed; Mahmoud El-Moutassem Bellah El Homossany; Sarah Mohamed Abdelmoniem; Tariq Yehia Abdelrahman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Biological and technical complications in root cap-retained overdentures after 3-15 years in situ: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Anja Stalder; Camille Henriette Berger; Ramona Buser; Julia Wittneben; Martin Schimmel; Samir Abou-Ayash
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Yogurt product intake and reduction of tooth loss risk in a Japanese community.

Authors:  Jiale Ma; Michiko Furuta; Kazuhiro Uchida; Toru Takeshita; Shinya Kageyama; Mikari Asakawa; Kenji Takeuchi; Shino Suma; Satoko Sakata; Jun Hata; Woosung Sohn; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Yoshihisa Yamashita
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 7.478

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.