Literature DB >> 26056017

Gender- and age-group-specific associations between physical performance and bone mineral density, falls, and osteoporotic fractures in Koreans: the Chungju Metabolic Disease Cohort study.

Yejee Lim1, Kyunghee Kim1, Sun-Hee Ko1, Kwanhoon Cho1, Eun-Hee Jang1, Seung-Hwan Lee1, Dong Jun Lim1, Ki Hyun Baek1, Hee-Sung Ha2, Mi Sun Park3, Hyeon-Woo Yim2,3, Won-Chul Lee2, Kun-Ho Yoon1, Ho Young Son1, Ki Won Oh4, Moo-Il Kang5.   

Abstract

Several factors increase the risk of fragility fracture, including low bone mineral density, falls, and poor physical performance. The associations among these factors have been investigated; however, most of the subjects of previous studies were either elderly men or elderly women, and the associations were controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between physical performance and bone mineral density, and the history of falls and fractures, stratified by gender and age group. We analyzed 5368 subjects who were aged 50 years or older, including 1288 younger men (younger than 70 years), 1615 younger women (younger than 70 years), 1087 older men (70 years or older), and 1378 older women (70 years or older). We used the one-leg standing time (OLST) for assessing static balance and the timed up-and-go test (TUGT) for assessing dynamic balance. The subjects in the worst performance quartile for the OLST were more likely to have osteoporosis than those in the best performance quartile. Additionally, women who had experienced a fracture during the past 2 years were 1.68 times more likely to be in the worst performance quartile for the OLST than women without a previous fracture. Although the TUGT time was not associated with either the incidence of osteoporosis or the fracture history, the odds ratios for falling were 1.51 and 1.28 as the TUGT time increased by one standard deviation in younger men and younger women, respectively. The findings of the present study show that the OLST was associated with the incidence of osteoporosis and previous fracture and that the TUGT time was associated with the incidence of falling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort study; Falls; Fractures; Osteoporosis; Physical performance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26056017     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-015-0674-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  46 in total

Review 1.  A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention.

Authors:  Stephen R Lord; Hylton B Menz; Anne Tiedemann
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians.

Authors:  Harold M Frost
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct.

Authors:  Parminder K Padgett; Jesse V Jacobs; Susan L Kasser
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06-07

4.  One-leg standing time and hip-fracture prediction.

Authors:  H Lundin; M Sääf; L-E Strender; S Nyren; S-E Johansson; H Salminen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  "'Timed up and go' test and bone mineral density measurement for fracture prediction.

Authors:  Kun Zhu; Amanda Devine; Joshua R Lewis; Satvinder S Dhaliwal; Richard L Prince
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-10

6.  Validity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women.

Authors:  K Honkanen; R Honkanen; L Heikkinen; H Kröger; S Saarikoski
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study.

Authors:  Bret H Goodpaster; Seok Won Park; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Kritchevsky; Michael Nevitt; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylavsky; Marjolein Visser; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Lower extremity physical performance and hip bone mineral density in elderly black and white men and women: cross-sectional associations in the Health ABC Study.

Authors:  Dennis R Taaffe; Eleanor M Simonsick; Marjolein Visser; Stefano Volpato; Michael C Nevitt; Jane A Cauley; Frances A Tylavsky; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Physical tests for patient selection for bone mineral density measurements in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Matti Kärkkäinen; Toni Rikkonen; Heikki Kröger; Joonas Sirola; Marjo Tuppurainen; Kari Salovaara; Jari Arokoski; Jukka Jurvelin; Risto Honkanen; Esko Alhava
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Predicting the development of diabetes using the product of triglycerides and glucose: the Chungju Metabolic Disease Cohort (CMC) study.

Authors:  Seung-Hwan Lee; Hyuk-Sang Kwon; Yong-Moon Park; Hee-Sung Ha; Seung Hee Jeong; Hae Kyung Yang; Jin-Hee Lee; Hyeon-Woo Yim; Moo-Il Kang; Won-Chul Lee; Ho-Young Son; Kun-Ho Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Movement control during one-leg standing is important for the bone mineral density maintenance or improvement.

Authors:  Takuya Umehara; Akinori Kaneguchi; Keita Watanabe; Nobuhisa Katayama; Daisuke Kuwahara; Ryo Kaneyashiki; Nobuhiro Kito; Masayuki Kakehashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.976

2.  Physical capability, physical activity, and their association with femoral bone mineral density in adults aged 40 years and older: The Tromsø study 2015-2016.

Authors:  A V Hauger; K Holvik; A Bergland; A Ståhle; N Emaus; B Morseth; B H Strand
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.