Literature DB >> 26055989

The limb-specific embodiment of a tool following experience.

Kimberley Jovanov1, Paul Clifton, Ali Mazalek, Michael Nitsche, Timothy N Welsh.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the incorporation of tools into the human body schema. Previous research on tool use suggests that through physical interaction with a tool, the representation of the body is adjusted to incorporate or "embody" the tool. The present experiment was conducted to test the limb-specific nature of tool embodiment. Participants were presented with images of a person holding a rake and executed hand- and foot-press responses to colored targets superimposed on the hand, foot, and rake of the image. This task was completed before and after moving a ball around a course with a hand-held rake. Consistent with previous research, a body-part compatibility effect emerged-response times (RTs) were shorter when the responding limb and target location were compatible (e.g., hand responses to targets on the hand) than when they were incompatible (e.g., hand responses to targets on the foot). Of greater theoretical relevance, hand RTs to targets presented on the hand were shorter than those to targets on the rake prior to experience, but were not different after completing the rake task. The post-experience similarity in hand RTs emerged because there was a significant reduction in RTs to targets on the rake following use. There was no significant pre-/post-experience change in hand RTs to targets on the hand or, importantly, for any response executed by the foot. These results provide new evidence that a tool is embodied in a limb-specific manner and is represented within the body schema as if it was an extension of the limb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26055989     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4342-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms?

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Daniela Mapelli; Sami Schiff; Piero Amodio; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05

2.  Imagined tool-use in near and far space modulates the extra-striate body area.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Peter H Weiss; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Miyauchi; T Tamada; Y Sasaki; R Takino; B Pütz; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Intensive tool-practice and skillfulness facilitate the extension of body representations in humans.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Daw-An Wu; Ilona M Bloem; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields.

Authors:  M S Graziano; C G Gross
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons.

Authors:  M S Graziano; G S Yap; C G Gross
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction.

Authors:  A Maravita; M Husain; K Clarke; J Driver
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space through tool-use: spatial extension or shift of the multi-sensory area.

Authors:  S Bonifazi; A Farnè; L Rinaldesi; E Làdavas
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.864

Review 10.  The neural basis of visual body perception.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  7 in total

1.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Empirical Evidence for Extended Cognitive Systems.

Authors:  Luis H Favela; Mary Jean Amon; Lorena Lobo; Anthony Chemero
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-11

3.  Body-part compatibility effects are modulated by the tendency for women to experience negative social comparative emotions and the body-type of the model.

Authors:  Eva Pila; Kimberely Jovanov; Timothy N Welsh; Catherine M Sabiston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tool-Use Training Induces Changes of the Body Schema in the Limb Without Using Tool.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Rixin Tang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The long developmental trajectory of body representation plasticity following tool use.

Authors:  Marie Martel; Livio Finos; Eric Koun; Alessandro Farnè; Alice Catherine Roy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Tool-use: An open window into body representation and its plasticity.

Authors:  Marie Martel; Lucilla Cardinali; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Learning of Artificial Sensation Through Long-Term Home Use of a Sensory-Enabled Prosthesis.

Authors:  Ivana Cuberovic; Anisha Gill; Linda J Resnik; Dustin J Tyler; Emily L Graczyk
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.