Literature DB >> 26055297

Evaluating the value proposition for improving vaccine thermostability to increase vaccine impact in low and middle-income countries.

Christopher L Karp1, Deborah Lans2, José Esparza2, Eleanore B Edson2, Katey E Owen3, Christopher B Wilson2, Penny M Heaton3, Orin S Levine4, Raja Rao4.   

Abstract

The need to keep vaccines cold in the face of high ambient temperatures and unreliable access to electricity is a challenge that limits vaccine coverage in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Greater vaccine thermostability is generally touted as the obvious solution. Despite conventional wisdom, comprehensive analysis of the value proposition for increasing vaccine thermostability has been lacking. Further, while significant investments have been made in increasing vaccine thermostability in recent years, no vaccine products have been commercialized as a result. We analyzed the value proposition for increasing vaccine thermostability, grounding the analysis in specific vaccine use cases (e.g., use in routine immunization [RI] programs, or in campaigns) and in the broader context of cold chain technology and country level supply chain system design. The results were often surprising. For example, cold chain costs actually represent a relatively small fraction of total vaccine delivery system costs. Further, there are critical, vaccine use case-specific temporal thresholds that need to be overcome for significant benefits to be reaped from increasing vaccine thermostability. We present a number of recommendations deriving from this analysis that suggest a rational path toward unlocking the value (maximizing coverage, minimizing total system costs) of increased vaccine thermostability, including: (1) the full range of thermostability of existing vaccines should be defined and included in their labels; (2) for new vaccines, thermostability goals should be addressed up-front at the level of the target product profile; (3) improving cold chain infrastructure and supply chain system design is likely to have the largest impact on total system costs and coverage in the short term-and will influence the degree of thermostability required in the future; (4) in the long term, there remains value in monitoring the emergence of disruptive technologies that could remove the entire RI portfolio out of the cold chain.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cold chain; Freeze protection; Supply chain; System design; Thermostability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26055297     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  15 in total

1.  New GMP manufacturing processes to obtain thermostable HIV-1 gp41 virosomes under solid forms for various mucosal vaccination routes.

Authors:  Mario Amacker; Charli Smardon; Laura Mason; Jack Sorrell; Kirk Jeffery; Michael Adler; Farien Bhoelan; Olga Belova; Mark Spengler; Beena Punnamoottil; Markus Schwaller; Olivia Bonduelle; Behazine Combadière; Toon Stegmann; Andrew Naylor; Richard Johnson; Desmond Wong; Sylvain Fleury
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 7.344

Review 2.  Challenges for nationwide vaccine delivery in African countries.

Authors:  Mario Songane
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-10-19

3.  Economic impact of thermostable vaccines.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Patrick T Wedlock; Leila A Haidari; Kate Elder; Julien Potet; Rachel Manring; Diana L Connor; Marie L Spiker; Kimberly Bonner; Arjun Rangarajan; Delphine Hunyh; Shawn T Brown
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Evaluation of temperature stability among different types and grades of vaccine storage units: Data from continuous temperature monitoring devices.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Helen Fisun; Sean Trimble; Paul Lucas; Cameron Noblit; John M Stevenson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Presentation matters: Buffers, packaging, and delivery devices for new, oral enteric vaccines for infants.

Authors:  Manjari Lal; Courtney Jarrahian
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  An economic evaluation of the controlled temperature chain approach for vaccine logistics: evidence from a study conducted during a meningitis A vaccine campaign in Togo.

Authors:  Mercy Mvundura; Patrick Lydon; Abdoulaye Gueye; Ibnou Khadim Diaw; Dadja Essoya Landoh; Bafei Toi; Anna-Lea Kahn; Debra Kristensen
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-06-23

7.  Improving the Immunogenicity of Native-like HIV-1 Envelope Trimers by Hyperstabilization.

Authors:  Alba Torrents de la Peña; Jean-Philippe Julien; Steven W de Taeye; Fernando Garces; Miklos Guttman; Gabriel Ozorowski; Laura K Pritchard; Anna-Janina Behrens; Eden P Go; Judith A Burger; Edith E Schermer; Kwinten Sliepen; Thomas J Ketas; Pavel Pugach; Anila Yasmeen; Christopher A Cottrell; Jonathan L Torres; Charlotte D Vavourakis; Marit J van Gils; Celia LaBranche; David C Montefiori; Heather Desaire; Max Crispin; Per Johan Klasse; Kelly K Lee; John P Moore; Andrew B Ward; Ian A Wilson; Rogier W Sanders
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a live, oral cholera vaccine formulation stored outside-the-cold-chain for 140 days.

Authors:  Tew Hui Xian; Kurunathan Sinniah; Chan Yean Yean; Venkateskumar Krishnamoorthy; Mohd Baidi Bahari; Manickam Ravichandran; Guruswamy Prabhakaran
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.615

9.  Cost-effectiveness of inhaled oxytocin for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a modelling study applied to two high burden settings.

Authors:  Natalie Carvalho; Mohammad Enamul Hoque; Victoria L Oliver; Abbey Byrne; Michelle Kermode; Pete Lambert; Michelle P McIntosh; Alison Morgan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Development of thermostable vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Yizhi Qi; Christopher B Fox
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 5.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.