Literature DB >> 26055259

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Versus Open Technique for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures.

Andrew R Hsu1, Carroll P Jones2, Bruce E Cohen2, W Hodges Davis2, J Kent Ellington2, Robert B Anderson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited incision techniques for acute Achilles tendon ruptures have been developed in recent years to improve recovery and reduce postoperative complications compared with traditional open repair. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications between acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated using a percutaneous Achilles repair system (PARS [Arthrex, Inc, Naples, FL]) versus open repair and evaluate the overall outcomes for operatively treated Achilles ruptures.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2014, 270 consecutive cases of operatively treated acute Achilles tendon ruptures were reviewed (101 PARS, 169 open). Patients with Achilles tendinopathy, insertional ruptures, chronic tears, or less than 3-month follow-up were excluded. Operative treatment consisted of a percutaneous technique (PARS) using a 2-cm transverse incision with FiberWire (Arthrex, Inc, Naples, FL) sutures or open repair using a 5- to 8-cm posteromedial incision with FiberWire in a Krackow fashion reinforced with absorbable sutures. Patient demographics were recorded along with medical comorbidities, activity at injury, time from injury to surgery, length of follow-up, return to baseline activities by 5 months, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The most common activity during injury for both groups was basketball (PARS: 39%, open: 47%). A greater number of patients treated with PARS were able to return to baseline physical activities by 5 months compared with the open group (PARS: 98%, open: 82%; P = .0001). There were no significant differences (P > .05) between groups in rates of rerupture (P = 1.0), sural neuritis (P = .16), wound dehiscence (P = .74), superficial (P = .29) and/or deep infection (P = .29), or reoperation (P = .13). There were no deep vein thromboses (DVTs) or reruptures in either group. In the PARS group, there were no cases of sural neuritis, 3 cases (3%) of superficial wound dehiscence, and 2 reoperations (2%) for superficial foreign-body reaction to FiberWire. In the open group, there were 5 cases (3%) of sural neuritis, 7 cases (4%) of superficial wound dehiscence, 3 cases (2%) of superficial infection, and 3 reoperations (2%) for deep infection.
CONCLUSION: The present study reports the largest single-center series of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in the literature with lower complication rates for operatively treated Achilles ruptures compared with previous reports. The overall complication rate for all operatively treated Achilles ruptures was 8.5% with no reruptures, and most patients (88%) were able to return to baseline activities by 5 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in rates of postoperative complications between PARS and open repair for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles tendon; PARS; complications; limited incision repair; open; rupture; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26055259     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715589632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  23 in total

1.  Activity level recovery after acute Achilles tendon rupture surgically repaired: a series of 29 patients with a mean follow-up of 46 months.

Authors:  Richard Zayni; Raphaël Coursier; Moudasser Zakaria; Jean-François Desrousseaux; Denis Cordonnier; Gilles Polveche
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

2.  HOW USEFUL IS ELASTOGRAPHY IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF ACHILLES TENDON REPAIR?

Authors:  Mehmet Ümit Çetin; Bedriye Koyuncu Sökmen; Fırat Fidan; Harun Mutlu; Abdülkadir Sari; Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel; Cengiz Kazdal
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 0.683

3.  Modified mini-incision "internal splinting" versus percutaneous repair technique of acute Achilles tendon rupture: five year retrospective case-controlled study.

Authors:  Xiang Jiang; Shenglong Qian; Cheng Chen; Helin Wu; Xiaosong Zhi; Dan Xu; Junhong Lian; Ximing Liu; Shijun Wei; Feng Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Photobiomodulation therapy increases collagen II after tendon experimental injury.

Authors:  Flávia Emi Akamatsu; Walcy Rosolia Teodoro; Ana Maria Itezerote; Lizandre Keren Ramos da Silveira; Samir Saleh; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Marcelo Lima Ribeiro; José Aires Pereira; Flávio Hojaij; Mauro Andrade; Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  A qualitative assessment of return to sport following Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Joshua G Peterson; Vehniah K Tjong; Mitesh P Mehta; Bailey N Goyette; Milap Patel; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Tendon end separation with loading in an Achilles tendon repair model: comparison of non-absorbable vs. absorbable sutures.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Jan Herman Kuiper; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Jón Karlsson; Katarina Nilsson-Helander
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Does elasticity of Achilles tendon change after suture applications? Evaluation of repair area by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Yavuz Selim Karatekin; Bedri Karaismailoglu; Gokhan Kaynak; Tahir Ogut; Atilla Suleyman Dikici; Emel Ure Esmerer; Onder Aydingoz; Huseyin Botanlioglu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Infection and Rerupture After Surgical Repair of Achilles Tendons.

Authors:  Toufic R Jildeh; Kelechi R Okoroha; Nathan E Marshall; Abraham Abdul-Hak; Ferras Zeni; Vasilios Moutzouros
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-25

9.  Mini-Invasive, Ultrasound Guided Repair of the Achilles Tendon Rupture-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Łukasz Paczesny; Jan Zabrzyński; Marcin Domżalski; Maciej Gagat; Miron Termanowski; Dawid Szwedowski; Łukasz Łapaj; Jacek Kruczyński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  What Is the Best Evidence to Guide Management of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Brad Meulenkamp; Taylor Woolnough; Wei Cheng; Risa Shorr; Dawn Stacey; Megan Richards; Arnav Gupta; Dean Fergusson; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.