Literature DB >> 26055021

Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Randa K Elmallah1, Jeffrey J Cherian1, Julio J Jauregui1, David A Padden2, Steven F Harwin3, Michael A Mont4.   

Abstract

Complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA), such as dislocation, component loosening and wear, continue to be common indications for revision surgery. Multiple studies have attributed some of these problems to poor acetabular cup alignment and placement outside of the purported radiographic safe zone. In addition, it has been shown that conventional manually performed acetabular cup placement may not lead to optimal alignment, regardless of surgical experience. Additionally, incorrect leg length and offset can lead to dissatisfaction and instability. Therefore, robotic-arm assisted surgery has been introduced to improve accuracy of cup placement and leg length, and to offset with the aim of reducing the risk of hip instability and improving satisfaction after primary THA. Our aim was to prospectively review the use of robotic-arm assisted surgery in 224 patients and to assess whether the pre-operatively determined radiographic targets were achieved post-operatively and the proportion of acetabular cups outside of the safe zone. Pre-determined anteversion and inclination were 15 and 40 degrees, respectively. Our results have shown that the use of robotic-arm assisted surgery resulted in a post-operative mean inclination of 40 degrees (range, 34 to 51 degrees) and a mean anteversion of 16 degrees (range, 9 to 25 degrees). Ninety-nine percent of the patients remained within the pre-designated safe zone. Evidence has shown that robotic-arm assisted surgery may have improved accuracy in cup placement when compared to conventional surgery and possibly to computer-assisted surgery. When compared to the literature on robotic-arm assisted surgery, our results were comparable. We believe that this surgical technique may aid in reducing post-operative THA complications, such as aseptic loosening and dislocations, but further prospective studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes and long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26055021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthik Karuppiah; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted.

Authors:  Aonnicha Burapachaisri; Ameer Elbuluk; Edem Abotsi; Jim Pierrepont; Seth A Jerabek; Aaron J Buckland; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-26

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of the cup position and orientation in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip between the Mako robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Keisuke Uemura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?

Authors:  Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

5.  Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery - A systematic review.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Javad Fotouhi; Octavian Andronic; Alexander Aichmair; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.