| Literature DB >> 26054525 |
Hasan Fallah Huseini1, Maryam Sotoudeh Anvari2, Yaser Tajallizadeh Khoob3, Shahram Rabbani4, Farshad Sharifi5, Seyed Masoud Arzaghi6, Hossein Fakhrzadeh7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that chemical constituents present in Pinus eldarica Medw (P. eldarica) nut possess antioxidant properties that may positively influence lipid profile. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of P. eldarica nut on the experimental atherosclerosis development in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26054525 PMCID: PMC4483207 DOI: 10.1186/s40199-015-0114-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
Percent of polyphenols in P. eldarica nut mean ± SD [16]
| Polyphenols | Percent |
|---|---|
| Catechin | 10.1 ± 0.18 |
| Epicatechin | 10.3 ± 0.18 |
| Gallic acid | 1.6 ± 0.09 |
| P. coumaric acid | 1.4 ± 0.12 |
| Ferullic acid | 1.7 ± 0.21 |
| O. coumaric acid | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
| Tyrosol | 29.1 ± 0.08 |
| Dimers of catechin and epicatechin | 7.5 ± 1.06 |
| Unknown | 38.18 ± 0.28 |
| Total phenols (ppm) | 483 ± 27 |
The fasting blood parameters and aortic wall area percent (mm2) after 8 weeks of high cholesterol diet (HCD) fed rabbits treated with P. eldarica nut extract at dosages of 50, 100, 200 mg/kg compared with high control HCD fed rabbits (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Triglyceride (mg/dl) | Cholesterol (mg/dl) | LDL (mg/dl) | HDL (mg/dl) | Aortic wall area percent (mm2) | Percent of aortic wall area changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (normal) | 60.4 ± 15.8 | 31.4 ± 4.5 | 9.2 ± 4.7 | 13.2 ± 3.2 | 0.247 ± 0.032 | |
| Control (HCD) | 91.2 ± 48.9 | 1545.6 ± 510.6 | 1060.6 ± 360.5 | 113.4 ± 55.8 | 0.296 ± 0.049 | 16.55↑ Compared with control (normal) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 93.6 ± 31.2 | 1253.0 ± 578.0 | 834.4 ± 201.2 | 87.6 ± 17.7 | 0.276 ± 0.048 | 6.76↓ compared with control (HCD) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 102.2 ± 37.7 | 834.4 ± 201.2 | 552.4 ± 158.2 | 90.2 ± 15.9 | 0.261 ± 0.038 | 11.83↓ compared with control (HCD) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 108.8 ± 28.0 | 710.4 ± 448.0 | 438.4 ± 292.2 | 99.4 ± 11.8 | 0.259 ± 0.042 | 12.50↓compared with control (HCD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant
*compared with control (normal) group
**compared with control (HCD) group
Fig. 1Morphological changes of the aortic wall atherosclerotic involvement. a Normal rabbits fed on standard laboratory diet, b Rabbits fed on HCD; c Rabbits fed on HCD and treated with 50 mg/kg of P. eldarica; d Rabbits fed on HCD and treated with 100 mg/kg of P. eldarica; e Rabbits fed on HCD and treated with 200 mg/kg of P. eldarica