Literature DB >> 26054290

Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass.

Eran Leshem-Rubinow1, Yigal Abramowitz2, Arie Steinvil2, Eyal Ben-Assa2, Ehud Chorin2, Yacov Shacham2, Lior Yankelson2, Maayan Konigstein2, Gad Keren2, Shmuel Banai2, Ariel Finkelstein2.   

Abstract

Patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are considered to be at increased perioperative risk for a redo cardiac operation. In the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), these patients constitute a considerable portion of those with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI. We evaluated the impact of previous CABG on transfemoral TAVI outcomes. Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n = 515) who underwent transfemoral TAVI were divided according to the presence of history of CABG. Patients with previous valvular surgery were excluded (n = 12). TAVI clinical end points and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions. Survival was estimated using Cox regression models at the enter mode with the dependent variable defined as all-cause mortality. Of the total 503 patients who underwent TAVI, 91 (18.1%) had previous CABG. At baseline, patients with previous CABG were younger (80.8 vs 83.1 years, p <0.001), mostly men (85% vs 35%, p <0.001), had more cardiac and vascular co-morbidities, higher mean logistic EuroSCORE (32.8 vs 22; p <0.001), lower ejection fraction (53% vs 56%, p <0.001), and lower AV gradients and larger valve area. At a mean follow-up of 636 days, the overall Valve Academic Research Consortium 2-adjudicated end points did not differ. No differences in mortality were observed at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after TAVI (hazard ratio 1.34, p = 0.55, Cox regression). We conclude that patients with previous CABG who underwent TAVI do not have increased risk of periprocedural complications or mortality, although having distinct clinical features compared with the total TAVI population.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26054290     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.04.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without previous coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Hideyuki Kawashima; Yusuke Watanabe; Ken Kozuma; Akihisa Kataoka; Makoto Nakashima; Hirofumi Hioki; Fukuko Nagura; Yugo Nara; Shinichi Shirai; Norio Tada; Motoharu Araki; Toru Naganuma; Futoshi Yamanaka; Hiroshi Ueno; Minoru Tabata; Kazuki Mizutani; Akihiro Higashimori; Kensuke Takagi; Masanori Yamamoto; Kentaro Hayashida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sharaf-Eldin Shehada; Yacine Elhmidi; Öznur Öztürk; Markus Kasel; Antonio H Frangieh; Fanar Mourad; Jaroslav Benedik; Jaafar El Bahi; Mohamed El Gabry; Matthias Thielmann; Heinz Jakob; Daniel Wendt
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Association between transcatheter aortic valve implantation or replacement and mortality, and major adverse events after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Yue Zheng; Tong Li
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2018-10-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.