OBJECTIVE: Larger portion sizes (PS) are associated with greater energy intake (EI), but little evidence exists on the appetitive effects of PS reduction. This study investigated the impact of reducing breakfast PS on subsequent EI, postprandial gastrointestinal hormone responses, and appetite ratings. METHODS: In a randomized crossover design (n = 33 adults; mean BMI 29 kg/m(2) ), a compulsory breakfast was based on 25% of gender-specific estimated daily energy requirements; PS was reduced by 20% and 40%. EI was measured at an ad libitum lunch (240 min) and snack (360 min) and by weighed diet diaries until bed. Blood was sampled until lunch in 20 participants. Appetite ratings were measured using visual analogue scales. RESULTS: EI at lunch (control: 2,930 ± 203; 20% reduction: 2,853 ± 198; 40% reduction: 2,911 ± 179 kJ) and over the whole day except breakfast (control: 7,374 ± 361; 20% reduction: 7,566 ± 468; 40% reduction: 7,413 ± 417 kJ) did not differ. Postprandial PYY, GLP-1, GIP, insulin, and fullness profiles were lower and hunger, desire to eat, and prospective consumption higher following 40% reduction compared to control. Appetite ratings profiles, but not hormone concentrations, were associated with subsequent EI. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller portions at breakfast led to reductions in gastrointestinal hormone secretion but did not affect subsequent energy intake, suggesting small reductions in portion size may be a useful strategy to constrain EI.
OBJECTIVE: Larger portion sizes (PS) are associated with greater energy intake (EI), but little evidence exists on the appetitive effects of PS reduction. This study investigated the impact of reducing breakfast PS on subsequent EI, postprandial gastrointestinal hormone responses, and appetite ratings. METHODS: In a randomized crossover design (n = 33 adults; mean BMI 29 kg/m(2) ), a compulsory breakfast was based on 25% of gender-specific estimated daily energy requirements; PS was reduced by 20% and 40%. EI was measured at an ad libitum lunch (240 min) and snack (360 min) and by weighed diet diaries until bed. Blood was sampled until lunch in 20 participants. Appetite ratings were measured using visual analogue scales. RESULTS: EI at lunch (control: 2,930 ± 203; 20% reduction: 2,853 ± 198; 40% reduction: 2,911 ± 179 kJ) and over the whole day except breakfast (control: 7,374 ± 361; 20% reduction: 7,566 ± 468; 40% reduction: 7,413 ± 417 kJ) did not differ. Postprandial PYY, GLP-1, GIP, insulin, and fullness profiles were lower and hunger, desire to eat, and prospective consumption higher following 40% reduction compared to control. Appetite ratings profiles, but not hormone concentrations, were associated with subsequent EI. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller portions at breakfast led to reductions in gastrointestinal hormone secretion but did not affect subsequent energy intake, suggesting small reductions in portion size may be a useful strategy to constrain EI.
Authors: B Orbitello; R Ciano; M Corsaro; P L Rocco; C Taboga; L Tonutti; M Armellini; M Balestrieri Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: J E Blundell; F Levin; N A King; B Barkeling; T Gustafsson; T Gustafson; P M Hellstrom; J J Holst; E Naslund Journal: Regul Pept Date: 2008-04-01
Authors: Sue Stock; Pierre Leichner; Alfred C K Wong; Mohamed A Ghatei; Timothy J Kieffer; Stephen R Bloom; Jean-Pierre Chanoine Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Wendy A M Blom; Annette Stafleu; Cees de Graaf; Frans J Kok; Gertjan Schaafsma; Henk F J Hendriks Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rachel L Batterham; Mark A Cohen; Sandra M Ellis; Carel W Le Roux; Dominic J Withers; Gary S Frost; Mohammad A Ghatei; Stephen R Bloom Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marie Vermote; Vickà Versele; Marijn Stok; Patrick Mullie; Eva D'Hondt; Benedicte Deforche; Peter Clarys; Tom Deliens Journal: Nutr J Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Marion M Hetherington; Pam Blundell-Birtill; Samantha J Caton; Joanne E Cecil; Charlotte E Evans; Barbara J Rolls; Tang Tang Journal: Proc Nutr Soc Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 6.297
Authors: Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Alexis D J Makin; Jason C G Halford; Susan A Jebb; Eric Robinson Journal: Food Qual Prefer Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 5.565
Authors: Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-09-14
Authors: Sarah Berkowitz; Len Marquart; Elton Mykerezi; Dennis Degeneffe; Marla Reicks Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.022