| Literature DB >> 26053038 |
Mamie Mizusaki Iyomasa1, Fernanda Silva Fernandes1, Daniela Mizusaki Iyomasa1, Yamba Carla Lara Pereira2, Rodrigo Alberto Restrepo Fernández3, Ricardo Alexandre Calzzani1, Glauce Crivelaro Nascimento4, Christie Ramos Andrade Leite-Panissi4, João Paulo Mardegan Issa1.
Abstract
Clinical evidence has shown that stress may be associated with alterations in masticatory muscle functions. Morphological changes in masticatory muscles induced by occlusal alterations and associated with emotional stress are still lacking in the literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of acute stress on metabolic activity and oxidative stress of masseter muscles of rats subjected to occlusal modification through morphological and histochemical analyses. In this study, adult Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: a group with extraction and acute stress (E+A); group with extraction and without stress (E+C); group without extraction and with acute stress (NO+A); and control group without both extraction and stress (NO+C). Masseter muscles were analyzed by Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDH), Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Diaphorase (NADH) and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) techniques. Statistical analyses and two-way ANOVA were applied, followed by Tukey-Kramer tests. In the SDH test, the E+C, E+A and NO+A groups showed a decrease in high desidrogenase activities fibers (P < 0.05), compared to the NO+C group. In the NADH test, there was no difference among the different groups. In the ROS test, in contrast, E+A, E+C and NO+A groups showed a decrease in ROS expression, compared to NO+C groups (P < 0.05). Modified dental occlusion and acute stress--which are important and prevalent problems that affect the general population--are important etiologic factors in metabolic plasticity and ROS levels of masseter muscles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26053038 PMCID: PMC4459827 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Demonstration of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) in different groups of rats.
Panel A, photomicrographs of the masseter muscle of rats. 200x magnification. Magnification bars: 100 μm. Panels B, C and D means the percentage of Light Fibers (B), Intermediate Fibers (C) and Dark Fibers (D) in different groups. Fig 1D: P < 0.05, NO+C group vs E+C, NO+A and E+A groups (Tukey-Kramer test).
Fig 2Demonstration of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Diaphorase (NADH) in different groups of rats.
Panel A, photomicrographs of the masseter muscle of rats. 200x magnification. Magnification bars: 100 μm. Panels B, C and D means the percentage of Light Fibers (B), Intermediate Fibers (C) and Dark Fibers (D) in different groups.
Fig 3Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in different group of rats.
Panel A, photomicrographs with fluorescent labeled for ROS of masseter muscle of rats. 200x magnification. Magnification bars: 50 μm. Panels B, C and D means de fluorescence intensity of ROS in differente groups. Fig 3B: P < 0.05, NO+C group vs E+C, NO+A and E+A groups; and P < 0.05, E+A group vs E+C group (Tukey-Kramer test).
Percentage of the three different fiber types identified by SDH and NADH reactions and average of ROS in the left masseter muscle in rats.
| Histochemical Technique | Fiber Types | Experimental Groups | Average | Percentage | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Light Fibers | NO + C | 55.78 | 2.13 | |
| E + C | 59.12 | 2.53 | |||
| NO + A | 57.37 | 4.29 | |||
| E + A | 56.25 | 3.45 | |||
| Intermediate Fibers | NO + C | 27.35 | 1.82 | ||
| E + C | 34.9 | 1.52 | |||
| NO + A | 31.42 | 3.99 | |||
| E + A | 36.18 | 1.52 | |||
| Dark Fibers | NO + C | 16.87 | 2.04 | ||
| E + C | 5.98 | 1.62 | |||
| NO + A | 11.21 | 2.01 | |||
| E + A | 7.57 | 1.98 | |||
|
| Light Fibers | NO + C | 53.24 | 2.03 | |
| E + C | 55.36 | 1.96 | |||
| NO + A | 49.38 | 1.55 | |||
| E + A | 57.46 | 1.1 | |||
| Intermediate Fibers | NO + C | 26.64 | 2.75 | ||
| E + C | 25.72 | 1.17 | |||
| NO + A | 24.71 | 1.91 | |||
| E + A | 23.74 | 1.95 | |||
| Dark Fibers | NO + C | 20.12 | 0.46 | ||
| E + C | 18.92 | 1.39 | |||
| NO + A | 25.91 | 1.69 | |||
| E + A | 18.8 | 1.59 | |||
|
| NO + C | 105.25 | 4.9 | ||
| E + C | 57.75 | 3.27 | |||
| NO + A | 71.6 | 6.1 | |||
| E + A | 90.0 | 0.7 |
NO + C: control group without both extraction and stress; E + C: group with extraction and without stress; NO + A: group without extraction and with acute stress and E + A: group with extraction and acute stress. SEM: Standart Error Means. The Two-way Anova statistical analysis reveals that in SDH technique, the percentage of relative areas of dark fibers decrease in the group submitted to unilateral extraction, acute stress or the association of both factors compared to control group, whereas NADH results didn’t show statistical differences between the groups. Furthermore, the ROS expression showed a decrease in all experimental groups analyzed compared to the NO + C group.
* P<0.05 Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test when compared with control group.
a P<0.05 Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test when compared E + C with E + A with group. Delta scores for each percentage of fibers (SDH and NADH) or average of fluorescence intensity (ROS) is indicated in the table.