Literature DB >> 26052649

A systematic method for search term selection in systematic reviews.

Jenna Thompson1, Jacqueline Davis1, Lorraine Mazerolle1.   

Abstract

The wide variety of readily available electronic media grants anyone the freedom to retrieve published references from almost any area of research around the world. Despite this privilege, keeping up with primary research evidence is almost impossible because of the increase in professional publishing across disciplines. Systematic reviews are a solution to this problem as they aim to synthesize all current information on a particular topic and present a balanced and unbiased summary of the findings. They are fast becoming an important method of research across a number of fields, yet only a small number of guidelines exist on how to define and select terms for a systematic search. This article presents a replicable method for selecting terms in a systematic search using the semantic concept recognition software called leximancer (Leximancer, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia). We use this software to construct a set of terms from a corpus of literature pertaining to transborder interventions for drug control and discuss the applicability of this method to systematic reviews in general. This method aims to contribute a more 'systematic' approach for selecting terms in a manner that is entirely replicable for any user.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  semantics; systematic review; systematic search; term

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 26052649     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  5 in total

1.  Semiautomated text analytics for qualitative data synthesis.

Authors:  Emily Haynes; Ruth Garside; Judith Green; Michael P Kelly; James Thomas; Cornelia Guell
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 5.273

2.  Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: Protocol for a qualitative systematic review of studies informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT) [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].

Authors:  Carl R May; Bianca Albers; Laura Desveaux; Tracy L Finch; Anthony Gilbert; Alyson Hillis; Melissa Girling; Roman Kislov; Anne MacFarlane; Frances S Mair; Christine M May; Elizabeth Murray; Sebastian Potthoff; Tim Rapley
Journal:  NIHR Open Res       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.

Authors:  Monika Mueller; Maddalena D'Addario; Matthias Egger; Myriam Cevallos; Olaf Dekkers; Catrina Mugglin; Pippa Scott
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  A Comparison of Leximancer Semi-automated Content Analysis to Manual Content Analysis: A Healthcare Exemplar Using Emotive Transcripts of COVID-19 Hospital Staff Interactive Webcasts.

Authors:  Teyl Engstrom; Jenny Strong; Clair Sullivan; Jason D Pole
Journal:  Int J Qual Methods       Date:  2022-08-18

5.  What does it mean to conduct participatory research with Indigenous peoples? A lexical review.

Authors:  Ann Dadich; Loretta Moore; Valsamma Eapen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.