Wei-Gen Zeng1, Meng-Jia Liu2, Zhi-Xiang Zhou3, Hui-Rong Hou4, Jian-Wei Liang1, Zheng Wang1, Xing-Mao Zhang1, Jun-Jie Hu1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhzhxpumc@163.com. 4. The Overall Planning Office, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) may increase the complexity of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of PAS on the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 378 colorectal cancer patients (group A) with a history of PAS were 1:1 matched to 378 controls (group B) without PAS from our prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. The two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, tumor location, type of surgical procedure, and tumor stage. RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were well balanced with respect to baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Group A was associated with significantly longer median operating time (220 versus 200 min; P = 0.002). Conversion rate in group A (63/378, 16.67%) was almost twice as high as that in group B (36/378, 9.55%; P = 0.004). Conversions caused by adhesion were more common in patients with a history of PAS (55.56% [35/63] versus 27.78% [10/36], P = 0.008). Postoperative recovery time, length of postoperative hospital stay, perioperative mortality and morbidity rate, lymph nodes harvested, circumferential resection margin positive rate, 3-y disease-free survival, and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer patients with PAS is time consuming, but the incidence of a successfully completed laparoscopic colorectal resection remains high, and the short- and long-term outcomes are not affected by PAS.
BACKGROUND: A history of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) may increase the complexity of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of PAS on the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 378 colorectal cancerpatients (group A) with a history of PAS were 1:1 matched to 378 controls (group B) without PAS from our prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. The two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, tumor location, type of surgical procedure, and tumor stage. RESULTS:Patients in the two groups were well balanced with respect to baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Group A was associated with significantly longer median operating time (220 versus 200 min; P = 0.002). Conversion rate in group A (63/378, 16.67%) was almost twice as high as that in group B (36/378, 9.55%; P = 0.004). Conversions caused by adhesion were more common in patients with a history of PAS (55.56% [35/63] versus 27.78% [10/36], P = 0.008). Postoperative recovery time, length of postoperative hospital stay, perioperative mortality and morbidity rate, lymph nodes harvested, circumferential resection margin positive rate, 3-y disease-free survival, and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal cancerpatients with PAS is time consuming, but the incidence of a successfully completed laparoscopic colorectal resection remains high, and the short- and long-term outcomes are not affected by PAS.