Ellie Hawkins1, Anne Jones2. 1. Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia. Electronic address: ellie.hawkins@my.jcu.edu.au. 2. Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia. Electronic address: anne.jones@jcu.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy in intensive care units (ICU) has traditionally focussed on the respiratory management of mechanically ventilated patients. Gradually, focus has shifted to include rehabilitation in adult ICUs, though evidence of a similar shift in the paediatric ICU (PICU) is limited. OBJECTIVES: Review the evidence to determine the role of physiotherapists in the management of mechanically ventilated patients in PICU. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of: PEDro, CINAHL, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies involving PICU patients who received physiotherapy while invasively ventilated were included in this review. Those involving neonatal or adult ICU patients, or patients on non-invasive or long-term ventilation, were not included in the study. STUDY APPRAISAL: All articles were critically appraised by two reviewers and results were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Six studies on chest physiotherapy (CPT) met the selection criteria. Results support the use of the expiratory flow increase technique and CPT, especially manual hyperinflation and vibrations, for secretion clearance. Evidence does not support the routine use of either CPT or suction alone. No studies investigating rehabilitation in PICU met selection criteria. LIMITATIONS: A lack of high level evidence was available to inform this review. CONCLUSION: Evidence indicates that CPT is still the focus of physiotherapy intervention in PICU for mechanically ventilated patients, and supports its use for secretion clearance in this setting. PROSPERO register for systematic reviews (registration no. CRD42014009582). Crown
BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy in intensive care units (ICU) has traditionally focussed on the respiratory management of mechanically ventilated patients. Gradually, focus has shifted to include rehabilitation in adult ICUs, though evidence of a similar shift in the paediatric ICU (PICU) is limited. OBJECTIVES: Review the evidence to determine the role of physiotherapists in the management of mechanically ventilated patients in PICU. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of: PEDro, CINAHL, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies involving PICU patients who received physiotherapy while invasively ventilated were included in this review. Those involving neonatal or adult ICU patients, or patients on non-invasive or long-term ventilation, were not included in the study. STUDY APPRAISAL: All articles were critically appraised by two reviewers and results were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Six studies on chest physiotherapy (CPT) met the selection criteria. Results support the use of the expiratory flow increase technique and CPT, especially manual hyperinflation and vibrations, for secretion clearance. Evidence does not support the routine use of either CPT or suction alone. No studies investigating rehabilitation in PICU met selection criteria. LIMITATIONS: A lack of high level evidence was available to inform this review. CONCLUSION: Evidence indicates that CPT is still the focus of physiotherapy intervention in PICU for mechanically ventilated patients, and supports its use for secretion clearance in this setting. PROSPERO register for systematic reviews (registration no. CRD42014009582). Crown
Authors: Martin C J Kneyber; Daniele de Luca; Edoardo Calderini; Pierre-Henri Jarreau; Etienne Javouhey; Jesus Lopez-Herce; Jürg Hammer; Duncan Macrae; Dick G Markhorst; Alberto Medina; Marti Pons-Odena; Fabrizio Racca; Gerhard Wolf; Paolo Biban; Joe Brierley; Peter C Rimensberger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Atsushi Kawaguchi; Gabrielle Bernier; Andy Adler; Guillaume Emeriaud; Philippe A Jouvet Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 2.692