| Literature DB >> 26051704 |
S Gerber1, K W Kim2, Y Zhang1,3, D Zhu4, N Plonka1,5, M Yi1,5, G L Dakovski4, D Leuenberger1, P S Kirchmann1, R G Moore1, M Chollet4, J M Glownia4, Y Feng4, J-S Lee6, A Mehta6, A F Kemper7, T Wolf8, Y-D Chuang3, Z Hussain3, C-C Kao9, B Moritz1, Z-X Shen1,5, T P Devereaux1, W-S Lee1.
Abstract
Ultrafast light pulses can modify electronic properties of quantum materials by perturbing the underlying, intertwined degrees of freedom. In particular, iron-based superconductors exhibit a strong coupling among electronic nematic fluctuations, spins and the lattice, serving as a playground for ultrafast manipulation. Here we use time-resolved X-ray scattering to measure the lattice dynamics of photoexcited BaFe2As2. On optical excitation, no signature of an ultrafast change of the crystal symmetry is observed, but the lattice oscillates rapidly in time due to the coherent excitation of an A1g mode that modulates the Fe-As-Fe bond angle. We directly quantify the coherent lattice dynamics and show that even a small photoinduced lattice distortion can induce notable changes in the electronic and magnetic properties. Our analysis implies that transient structural modification can be an effective tool for manipulating the electronic properties of multi-orbital systems, where electronic instabilities are sensitive to the orbital character of bands.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26051704 PMCID: PMC4468847 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Crystal structure and time-resolved X-ray scattering.
(a) Tetragonal crystal structure of BaFe2As2 in the presence of the A1 phonon mode, parametrized by the Fe–As–Fe bond angle α. (b) Schematic of the experimental setup with the incoming infrared (IR) pump (red) and the X-ray probe pulse (blue). The temporal evolution of the diffraction pattern from the photo-excited BaFe2As2 single crystal was measured with a CSPAD-140k area detector. Δt is the time delay of the probe pulse with respect to the pump pulse.
Figure 2Structural phase transitions without optical pumping.
(a–c) Diffraction pattern of the (118)T lattice Bragg peak at temperatures in the vicinity of the structural (Ts) and magnetic (TN) phase transition. (d) Line cut on the area detector (dashed line in a) slowly cooling from a nominal temperature of T=140 to 137 K. The tetragonal (118)T Bragg peak splits first at Ts, due to the transition to the orthorhombic crystal structure, and then further at TN as a result of the onset of SDW order.
Figure 3Photo-excited lattice dynamics below .
(a) Temporal evolution of the line cut through the split Bragg peak at Ts>T>TN at an absorbed pump fluence of 2.9 mJ cm−2. The inset depicts the line cut on the area detector. (b) Diffraction peak profiles along the line cut at selected delay times. No changes are observed in peak position and width. (c) Subtraction of the averaged line cuts before time zero (Δt=−0.5 to 0 ps) reveals a photo-excited periodic intensity modulation of both orthorhombic domains for positive time delays.
Figure 4Photo-excited coherent lattice dynamics for >.
(a) Temporal evolution of the line cut after subtraction of the averaged line cuts before time zero. (b) Integrated intensity on the area detector as a function of time. Both a and b show a distinct modulation of the (118)T Bragg peak intensity after photoexcitation. Time zero (Δt=0) is defined as the time delay, at which one observes a rise of the diffracted Bragg peak intensity. The background (black line) is modelled as a convolution of the overall time resolution and an exponential decay of the initial ultrafast intensity rise, on a linear slope. (c) The background-subtracted integrated intensity and the Fourier transform (FT, inset of b) both identify the coherent oscillations with the 5.45(4) THz A1 phonon mode. The frequency error from a damped oscillator fit to the background-subtracted integrated intensity δI(Δt)/I0 (red line in c) corresponds to 1 s.d.
Figure 5Dynamics of the Fe–As–Fe bond angle.
(a) Dependence of the (118)T Bragg peak intensity on the bond angle α from a structure factor calculation (orange line). The shaded area indicates the magnitude of the initial change Δαmax=−0.62(4)°, as obtained by comparison with the maximal intensity change of the integrated Bragg peak intensity in Fig. 4b. (b) The deduced temporal evolution Δα(t) from the raw data (without deconvolution of the finite time resolution), reveals an A1 oscillation amplitude Δαosc=0.27(8)°, following the initial decrease of α. The errors of Δαmax and Δαosc correspond to 1 s.d.
Figure 6Influence of α on the electronic structure and SDW order.
(a) Effect of Δα=−1.2° on the low-energy bands along the Γ–Y momentum cut in the SDW-folded Brillouin zone. The equilibrium bands (solid lines) shift as a result of the change in the Fe–As–Fe bond angle (dashed lines). The dominant (>50%) d-orbital character for each band is colour coded, that is, d (red), d (green) and d (blue). We choose twice the experimentally observed Δαmax to better illustrate the qualitative change. The inset shows the equilibrium Fermi surface and the locations of the Γ- and Y-points. The unshaded area represents the Q=(π, 0) SDW-folded Brillouin zone. (b,c) Enlarged portions of the squares (dashed lines) in a show the effect of Δα=−1.2° on the Fermi surface in the SDW-folded Brillouin zone. Equilibrium Fermi surface pockets (left half of each panel) shift to new positions under the change of α (right half of each panel). Improved nesting of bands with similar orbital character (d) is observed at the Y-point. (d) Results of self-consistent Hartree–Fock mean-field calculations for the relative change of TN as a function of Δα. The arrow indicates a 6.5% increase in TN for the experimentally observed Δαmax≈−0.6°. αtet is the Fe–As–Fe bond angle for a regular FeAs4 tetrahedron, where superconductivity is found to be maximal in iron-based compounds2122. The orange line is a fit through the full data set as obtained from the mean-field calculations.