Xiaorong Yang1, Hui Chen1, Suyun Li1, Qiang Wang1, Lulu Pan1, Chongqi Jia2. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, PR China. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, PR China. Electronic address: jiachongqi@sdu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have researched the association between monoamine oxidase gene (MAO) polymorphisms and smoking behavior, but the conclusion is quite inconsistent. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association of MAO-A C1460T, MAO-A VNTR and MAO-B G644A polymorphisms with smoking behavior. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed to identify all eligible studies. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate the pooled effect values and their 95% confidence intervals. Meta-regression and the 'leave one out' sensitivity analysis were used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The risk of bias was assessed by the Egger regression asymmetry test. RESULTS: 11 articles conformed to the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed T allele in MAO-A C1460T reduced the risk of heavy smoking (OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.52-0.84; I(2)=0.0%), especially in Caucasians; the active group in MAO-A VNTR increased the likelihood of failed smoking cessation in males (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.22; I(2)=0.0%); A allele in MAO-B G644A reduced the risk of heavy smoking in males (OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.98). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the low activity of monoamine oxidase gene polymorphisms has a protective effect on smoking cessation and heaviness. Some associations and applications should be further confirmed.
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have researched the association between monoamine oxidase gene (MAO) polymorphisms and smoking behavior, but the conclusion is quite inconsistent. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association of MAO-AC1460T, MAO-A VNTR and MAO-BG644A polymorphisms with smoking behavior. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed to identify all eligible studies. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate the pooled effect values and their 95% confidence intervals. Meta-regression and the 'leave one out' sensitivity analysis were used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The risk of bias was assessed by the Egger regression asymmetry test. RESULTS: 11 articles conformed to the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed T allele in MAO-AC1460T reduced the risk of heavy smoking (OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.52-0.84; I(2)=0.0%), especially in Caucasians; the active group in MAO-A VNTR increased the likelihood of failed smoking cessation in males (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.22; I(2)=0.0%); A allele in MAO-BG644A reduced the risk of heavy smoking in males (OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.98). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the low activity of monoamine oxidase gene polymorphisms has a protective effect on smoking cessation and heaviness. Some associations and applications should be further confirmed.