Literature DB >> 26050537

Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Secondary Grafts with Early Intervention Are Comparable with Fellow-Eye Primary Grafts.

Marianne O Price1, Matthew T Feng2, Yuri McKee2, Francis W Price2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) after failed primary DMEK.
DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five DMEK recipients 42 to 89 years of age.
METHODS: An initial consecutive series of 1655 DMEK surgeries was reviewed to identify cases of secondary DMEK after failed primary DMEK (n = 55). A paired fellow-eye analysis was performed with a subgroup of 29 patients who underwent secondary DMEK in 1 eye and successful primary DMEK in the fellow eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness, and 1-year endothelial cell loss.
RESULTS: The median follow-up after DMEK regraft was 18 months (range, 3-61 months). All 55 regrafts cleared, 8 (15%) had air reinjected to promote attachment, 1 eye (2%) with trabeculectomy and progressive synechiae demonstrated late endothelial failure, and no rejection episodes occurred (0%). In the paired analysis, the median duration of endothelial decompensation before the regraft was 21 days (range, 2-133 days). At 1, 3, 6, or 12 months, CDVA did not differ between the primary and secondary grafts in fellow eyes (mean difference, ≤2 Snellen letters; P > 0.05 at all examinations). At 1 year, the visual acuity was ≥20/20 in 61%, ≥20/25 in 81%, and ≥20/40 in 100% of the secondary grafts in the paired analysis, excluding 1 eye with retinal problems. Vision differed by ≤1 line between fellow eyes in all but the 1 patient with the longest time to regraft (133 days), who demonstrated central haze and irregular astigmatism from anterior stromal scarring during that period. At 1 year, CDVA associated with the scarring was 20/40 versus 20/20 for the fellow-eye primary graft. The central corneal thickness was comparable between fellow-eye primary and secondary grafts at 3, 6, and 12 months (mean difference at 1 year, 2 μm; P = 0.57). The 1-year endothelial cell loss was comparable in primary and secondary grafts (27% vs. 31%, respectively; P = 0.58).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received prompt intervention to minimize the duration of central corneal decompensation, the visual outcomes with secondary DMEK matched the fellow-eye visual outcomes with primary DMEK.
Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26050537     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  6 in total

1.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Failure Associated with Innate Immune Activation.

Authors:  Zala Lužnik; Silke Oellerich; Karin Roesch; Jia Yin; Markus Zumbansen; Lars Franken; Gerrit R J Melles; Reza Dana
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Management of Upside-Down Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series.

Authors:  Ahmed Shalaby Bardan; Mohamed B Goweida; Hesham F El Goweini; Christopher Sc Liu
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Allister Gibbons; Ella H Leung; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Secondary DMEK following failed primary DMEK.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Palaiologos Alexopoulos; Ioannis Giachos; Eleftherios Giallouros; Walter Sekundo; Apostolos Lazaridis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Functional outcome of repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal decompensation following graft failure after primary DMEK.

Authors:  Bishr Agha; Mehdi Shajari; Anna Slavik-Lencova; Thomas Kohnen; Ingo Schmack
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-07

6.  Outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Abdulrahman S Khairallah
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.484

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.