Eugene P Rhee1. 1. Nephrology Division and Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent metabolomics studies of renal disease, outlining some of the limitations of the literature to date. RECENT FINDINGS: The application of metabolomics in nephrology research has expanded from the initial analyses of uremia to include both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of earlier stages of kidney disease. Although these studies have nominated several potential markers of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) and CKD progression, a lack of overlap in metabolite coverage has limited the ability to synthesize results across groups. Furthermore, direct examination of renal metabolite handling has underscored the substantial impact kidney function has on these potential markers (and many other circulating metabolites). In experimental studies, metabolomics has been used to identify a signature of decreased mitochondrial function in diabetic nephropathy and a preference for aerobic glucose metabolism in polycystic kidney disease. In each case, these studies have outlined novel therapeutic opportunities. Finally, as a complement to the longstanding interest in renal metabolite clearance, the microbiome has been increasingly recognized as the source of many plasma metabolites, including some with potential functional relevance to CKD and its complications. SUMMARY: The high-throughput, high-resolution phenotyping enabled by metabolomics technologies has begun to provide insight on renal disease in clinical, physiologic, and experimental contexts.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent metabolomics studies of renal disease, outlining some of the limitations of the literature to date. RECENT FINDINGS: The application of metabolomics in nephrology research has expanded from the initial analyses of uremia to include both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of earlier stages of kidney disease. Although these studies have nominated several potential markers of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) and CKD progression, a lack of overlap in metabolite coverage has limited the ability to synthesize results across groups. Furthermore, direct examination of renal metabolite handling has underscored the substantial impact kidney function has on these potential markers (and many other circulating metabolites). In experimental studies, metabolomics has been used to identify a signature of decreased mitochondrial function in diabetic nephropathy and a preference for aerobic glucose metabolism in polycystic kidney disease. In each case, these studies have outlined novel therapeutic opportunities. Finally, as a complement to the longstanding interest in renal metabolite clearance, the microbiome has been increasingly recognized as the source of many plasma metabolites, including some with potential functional relevance to CKD and its complications. SUMMARY: The high-throughput, high-resolution phenotyping enabled by metabolomics technologies has begun to provide insight on renal disease in clinical, physiologic, and experimental contexts.
Authors: Raymond Vanholder; Rita De Smet; Griet Glorieux; Angel Argilés; Ulrich Baurmeister; Philippe Brunet; William Clark; Gerald Cohen; Peter Paul De Deyn; Reinhold Deppisch; Beatrice Descamps-Latscha; Thomas Henle; Achim Jörres; Horst Dieter Lemke; Ziad A Massy; Jutta Passlick-Deetjen; Mariano Rodriguez; Bernd Stegmayr; Peter Stenvinkel; Ciro Tetta; Christoph Wanner; Walter Zidek Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: John C Lindon; Elaine Holmes; Mary E Bollard; Elizabeth G Stanley; Jeremy K Nicholson Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Raymond Vanholder; Eva Schepers; Anneleen Pletinck; Evi V Nagler; Griet Glorieux Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Vallabh O Shah; Raymond R Townsend; Harold I Feldman; Kirk L Pappan; Elizabeth Kensicki; David L Vander Jagt Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Kumar Sharma; Bethany Karl; Anna V Mathew; Jon A Gangoiti; Christina L Wassel; Rintaro Saito; Minya Pu; Shoba Sharma; Young-Hyun You; Lin Wang; Maggie Diamond-Stanic; Maja T Lindenmeyer; Carol Forsblom; Wei Wu; Joachim H Ix; Trey Ideker; Jeffrey B Kopp; Sanjay K Nigam; Clemens D Cohen; Per-Henrik Groop; Bruce A Barshop; Loki Natarajan; William L Nyhan; Robert K Naviaux Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mina H Hanna; Jeffrey L Segar; Lynn M Teesch; David C Kasper; Franz S Schaefer; Patrick D Brophy Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Monika A Niewczas; Tammy L Sirich; Anna V Mathew; Jan Skupien; Robert P Mohney; James H Warram; Adam Smiles; Xiaoping Huang; Walker Walker; Jaeman Byun; Edward D Karoly; Elizabeth M Kensicki; Gerard T Berry; Joseph V Bonventre; Subramaniam Pennathur; Timothy W Meyer; Andrzej S Krolewski Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Eugene P Rhee; Clary B Clish; Julia Wenger; Jason Roy; Sammy Elmariah; Kerry A Pierce; Kevin Bullock; Amanda H Anderson; Robert E Gerszten; Harold I Feldman Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Julia Z Xu; Melanie E Garrett; Karen L Soldano; Sean T Chen; Clary B Clish; Allison E Ashley-Koch; Marilyn J Telen Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Subodh J Saggi; Kelly Mercier; Jessica R Gooding; Eli Friedman; Usha Vyas; Natarajan Ranganathan; Pari Ranganathan; Susan McRitchie; Susan Sumner Journal: Int J Probiotics Prebiotics Date: 2017-08-21
Authors: Jian-Jun Liu; Sujoy Ghosh; Jean-Paul Kovalik; Jianhong Ching; Hyung Won Choi; Subramaniam Tavintharan; Choon Nam Ong; Chee Fang Sum; Scott A Summers; E Shyong Tai; Su Chi Lim Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2016-12-16
Authors: Thomas J Velenosi; Anzel Hennop; David A Feere; Alvin Tieu; Andrew S Kucey; Polydoros Kyriacou; Laura E McCuaig; Stephanie E Nevison; Michael A Kerr; Bradley L Urquhart Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 4.379