Paolo Pesce1, Luigi Canullo2, Maria Gabriella Grusovin3, Hugo de Bruyn4, Jan Cosyn5, Paolo Pera6. 1. Lecturer, Department of surgical and diagnostic sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.pesce@unige.it. 2. Lecturer, Dental Institute Toscano, Viareggio, Italy. 3. Professor, Periodontology Department, Vita-Salute University Milano, Milan, Italy. 4. Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 5. Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Belgium, Brussels, Belgium. 6. Professor, Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The recent literature underlines a correlation between plaque and the development of periimplantitis but neglects the importance of the prosthetic factors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to appraise the available literature to evaluate the role played by cement excess and misfitting components on the development of periimplantitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search restricted to the English language was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register up to September 1, 2014, based on a selected search algorithm. Only cohort studies and case-control studies were included without additional restrictions. The presence of periimplantitis and implant failure were considered primary and secondary outcome variables. RESULTS: The search produced 275 potentially relevant titles, of which only 2 were found eligible. They showed a correlation in cemented implant prostheses between cement excess and the presence of periimplant disease, especially in patients with a history of periodontal disease. After cement excess removal by means of debridement, disease symptoms disappeared around most of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific articles on prosthetic risk factors for periimplantitis are scarce. Although the studies found on cement remnants have a high risk for bias, cement excess seems to be associated with mucositis and possibly with periimplantitis, especially in patients with a history of periodontal disease.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The recent literature underlines a correlation between plaque and the development of periimplantitis but neglects the importance of the prosthetic factors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to appraise the available literature to evaluate the role played by cement excess and misfitting components on the development of periimplantitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search restricted to the English language was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register up to September 1, 2014, based on a selected search algorithm. Only cohort studies and case-control studies were included without additional restrictions. The presence of periimplantitis and implant failure were considered primary and secondary outcome variables. RESULTS: The search produced 275 potentially relevant titles, of which only 2 were found eligible. They showed a correlation in cemented implant prostheses between cement excess and the presence of periimplant disease, especially in patients with a history of periodontal disease. After cement excess removal by means of debridement, disease symptoms disappeared around most of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific articles on prosthetic risk factors for periimplantitis are scarce. Although the studies found on cement remnants have a high risk for bias, cement excess seems to be associated with mucositis and possibly with periimplantitis, especially in patients with a history of periodontal disease.
Authors: Maximilian Koch; Maximilian Göltz; Meng Xiangjun; Matthias Karl; Stefan Rosiwal; Andreas Burkovski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-02-09 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Reham N AlJasser; Mohammed A AlSarhan; Dalal H Alotaibi; Saleh AlOraini; Abdul Sadekh Ansari; Syed Rashid Habib; Muhammad Sohail Zafar Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2021-05-25
Authors: Maria Menini; Francesco Bagnasco; Ivan Calimodio; Nicolò Di Tullio; Francesca Delucchi; Domenico Baldi; Francesco Pera Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Ella A Naumova; Felix Roth; Berit Geis; Christine Baulig; Wolfgang H Arnold; Andree Piwowarczyk Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 3.623