Literature DB >> 26049939

Adolescent and Young Women's Contraceptive Decision-Making Processes: Choosing "The Best Method for Her".

Juliana Melo1, Marissa Peters2, Stephanie Teal2, Maryam Guiahi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate influences on adolescent and young women's contraceptive decision-making processes.
METHODS: We conducted 21 individual interviews with women who presented to an adolescent-focused Title X family planning clinic seeking a new contraceptive method. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide, audio-taped and transcribed. Three researchers independently coded the transcripts using grounded theory; codes were organized into overarching themes and discrepancies were resolved.
RESULTS: After identification of themes, we organized the conceptual framework of the decision-making process using the transtheoretical model of behavior change in which participants move through 4 stages: (1) contemplation, (2) preparation, (3) action, and (4) maintenance. When contemplating contraception, most of our participants were highly motivated to avoid pregnancy. During preparation, participants gathered information related to their contraceptive concerns. Participants cited peers as primary informants and healthcare providers as experts in the field. Participants integrated information received with their personal concerns about contraception initiation; the most common concerns were effectiveness, method duration, convenience, and side effects. When participants acted on choosing a contraceptive method they described how it fit their individual needs. They considered their contraceptive experiences unique and not necessarily applicable to others. During maintenance, they acted as informants for other peers, but most commonly expressed that each individual must choose "the best method for her."
CONCLUSIONS: When adolescent and young women select a contraceptive method they balance the benefits and risks of available methods portrayed by peers and provider in the context of their personal concerns. Peer influence appeared to be greatest when participants shared contraceptive concerns and goals.
Copyright © 2015 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Contraceptive uptake; Decision making; Qualitative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26049939     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  9 in total

1.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

2.  Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  C Emily Hendrick; Joshua N Cone; Jessica Cirullo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Adolesc Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

3.  Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Judith Fitzpatrick; Jody Steinauer; Lawrence Swiader; Kevin Grumbach; Cara Hall; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch.

Authors:  Katherine He; Vanessa K Dalton; Melissa K Zochowski; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Development of an Online Contraceptive Decision Aid for College Women.

Authors:  Molly Redman; Jenny Brian; Dongwen Wang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

6.  Urban Adolescents' and Young Adults' Decision-Making Process around Selection of Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Marisa Felsher; Faye Korich; Amanda M Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Rachel Paul; Bridget C Huysman; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Patient perceptions of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Katharine Sznajder; Diana N Carvajal; Carolyn Sufrin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

Authors:  Justine P Wu; Laura J Damschroder; Michael D Fetters; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Benjamin F Crabtree; Shawna V Hudson; Mack T Ruffin; Juliana Fucinari; Minji Kang; L Susan Taichman; John W Creswell
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-04-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.