Bruce D Allan1, Hala Hassan2, Alvin Ieong2. 1. From Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: bruce.allan@ucl.ac.uk. 2. From Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a new multiple regression-derived nomogram for myopic wavefront laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective comparative case series. METHODS: Multiple regression modeling was used to derive a simplified formula for adjusting attempted spherical correction in myopic LASIK. An adaptation of Thibos' power vector method was then applied to derive adjustments to attempted cylindrical correction in eyes with 1.0 diopter (D) or more of preoperative cylinder. These elements were combined in a new nomogram (nomogram II). RESULTS: The 3-month refractive results for myopic wavefront LASIK (spherical equivalent ≤11.0 D; cylinder ≤4.5 D) were compared between 299 consecutive eyes treated using the earlier nomogram (nomogram I) in 2009 and 2010 and 414 eyes treated using nomogram II in 2011 and 2012. There was no significant difference in treatment accuracy (variance in the postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent error) between nomogram I and nomogram II (P = .73, Bartlett test). Fewer patients treated with nomogram II had more than 0.5 D of residual postoperative astigmatism (P = .0001, Fisher exact test). There was no significant coupling between adjustments to the attempted cylinder and the achieved sphere (P = .18, t test). CONCLUSIONS: Discarding marginal influences from a multiple regression-derived nomogram for myopic wavefront LASIK had no clinically significant effect on treatment accuracy. Thibos' power vector method can be used to guide adjustments to the treatment cylinder alongside nomograms designed to optimize postoperative spherical equivalent results in myopic LASIK. mentioned.
PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a new multiple regression-derived nomogram for myopic wavefront laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective comparative case series. METHODS: Multiple regression modeling was used to derive a simplified formula for adjusting attempted spherical correction in myopic LASIK. An adaptation of Thibos' power vector method was then applied to derive adjustments to attempted cylindrical correction in eyes with 1.0 diopter (D) or more of preoperative cylinder. These elements were combined in a new nomogram (nomogram II). RESULTS: The 3-month refractive results for myopic wavefront LASIK (spherical equivalent ≤11.0 D; cylinder ≤4.5 D) were compared between 299 consecutive eyes treated using the earlier nomogram (nomogram I) in 2009 and 2010 and 414 eyes treated using nomogram II in 2011 and 2012. There was no significant difference in treatment accuracy (variance in the postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent error) between nomogram I and nomogram II (P = .73, Bartlett test). Fewer patients treated with nomogram II had more than 0.5 D of residual postoperative astigmatism (P = .0001, Fisher exact test). There was no significant coupling between adjustments to the attempted cylinder and the achieved sphere (P = .18, t test). CONCLUSIONS: Discarding marginal influences from a multiple regression-derived nomogram for myopic wavefront LASIK had no clinically significant effect on treatment accuracy. Thibos' power vector method can be used to guide adjustments to the treatment cylinder alongside nomograms designed to optimize postoperative spherical equivalent results in myopic LASIK. mentioned.