Literature DB >> 26049689

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression analysed by the clone SP 120 rabbit antibody is not predictive in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant gemcitabine - Results from the CONKO-001 trial.

M Sinn1, H Riess2, B V Sinn3, J M Stieler2, U Pelzer2, J K Striefler2, H Oettle4, M Bahra5, C Denkert3, H Bläker3, P Lohneis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) is considered to predict survival in patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. A standard evaluation system for immunohistochemical analysis (antibody, scoring system) has not yet been established.
METHODS: CONKO-001, a prospective randomised phase III study investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine (gem) as compared to observation (obs). Tumour samples of 156 patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry with the rabbit monoclonal antibody SP120 (Ventana Medical Systems) for expression of hENT1. Kaplan-Meier analyses for median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed in dependence of hENT1 expression measured analogously to Farrell et al. 2009 and Poplin et al. 2013.
RESULTS: For the 88 gem and 68 obs patients, median DFS/OS was 12.9/22.7 months and 6.2/19.1 months. High hENT1 expression was not associated with improved median DFS (Farrell: no hENT1 22.2 months, low hENT1 13.7 months, high hENT1 12.1 months, p=0.248; Poplin: low hENT1 13.2 months versus high hENT1 11.5 months, p=0.5) or median OS (Farrell: no hENT1 21.7 months, low hENT1 24.7 months, high hENT1 19.5, p=0.571; Poplin: low hENT1 24.4 months versus high hENT1 19.7 months, p=0.92;) in the gem group or in the obs group (median DFS Farrell: no hENT1 5.1 months, low hENT1 6.2 months, high hENT1 7.5 months, p=0.375; Poplin: low hENT1 6.2 months versus high hENT1 5.9 months, p=0.83; median OS Farrell: no hENT1 20.2months, low hENT1 17.7 months, high HENT1 19.1 months, p=0.738; Poplin: low hENT1 17.7 months versus high hENT1 20.4 months, p=0.65) measured by the Farrell or Poplin Score.
CONCLUSIONS: We cannot confirm a predictive role of hENT1 measured by the clone SP120 rabbit antibody in our study population. Reproducible standard procedures are urgently needed prior to the implementation or exclusion of hENT1 as a predictive biomarker in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN34802808.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant therapy; CONKO-001; Gemcitabine; Pancreatic cancer; Predictive biomarker; hENT1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26049689     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Macarulla; T Fernández; M E Gallardo; O Hernando; A M López; M Hidalgo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in personalized gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Helena Verdaguer; Tamara Saurí; Teresa Macarulla
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  The evolution into personalized therapies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Anteneh A Tesfaye; Mandana Kamgar; Asfar Azmi; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.512

4.  Use of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment following chemotherapy with folfirinox for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthieu Sarabi; Laetitia Mais; Nadia Oussaid; Françoise Desseigne; Pierre Guibert; Christelle De La Fouchardiere
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: potential diagnostic and prognostic significance in clinical practice.

Authors:  Xudong Zhao; Yongsu Ma; Xiu Dong; Zhengkui Zhang; Xiaodong Tian; Xiaohang Zhao; Yinmo Yang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  FOLFIRINOX and translational studies: Towards personalized therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Caparello; Laura L Meijer; Ingrid Garajova; Alfredo Falcone; Tessa Y Le Large; Niccola Funel; Geert Kazemier; Godefridus J Peters; Enrico Vasile; Elisa Giovannetti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  [Personalized cancer medicine : Biomarkers for molecular therapy stratification in pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  S Ormanns
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  EMT-Induced Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer Involves the Functional Loss of Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1.

Authors:  Brenna Weadick; Debasis Nayak; Avinash K Persaud; Sau Wai Hung; Radhika Raj; Moray J Campbell; Wei Chen; Junan Li; Terence M Williams; Rajgopal Govindarajan
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 6.009

9.  Upstream and Downstream Co-inhibition of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathways in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew H Wong; Aiqun Xue; Robert C Baxter; Nick Pavlakis; Ross C Smith
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Biomarkers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: current perspectives.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Matthew A Firpo; Courtney L Scaife; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.