Literature DB >> 26049476

Analysis and comparison of CVS-ADC approaches up to third order for the calculation of core-excited states.

Jan Wenzel1, Andre Holzer1, Michael Wormit1, Andreas Dreuw1.   

Abstract

The extended second order algebraic-diagrammatic construction (ADC(2)-x) scheme for the polarization operator in combination with core-valence separation (CVS) approximation is well known to be a powerful quantum chemical method for the calculation of core-excited states and the description of X-ray absorption spectra. For the first time, the implementation and results of the third order approach CVS-ADC(3) are reported. Therefore, the CVS approximation has been applied to the ADC(3) working equations and the resulting terms have been implemented efficiently in the adcman program. By treating the α and β spins separately from each other, the unrestricted variant CVS-UADC(3) for the treatment of open-shell systems has been implemented as well. The performance and accuracy of the CVS-ADC(3) method are demonstrated with respect to a set of small and middle-sized organic molecules. Therefore, the results obtained at the CVS-ADC(3) level are compared with CVS-ADC(2)-x values as well as experimental data by calculating complete basis set limits. The influence of basis sets is further investigated by employing a large set of different basis sets. Besides the accuracy of core-excitation energies and oscillator strengths, the importance of cartesian basis functions and the treatment of orbital relaxation effects are analyzed in this work as well as computational timings. It turns out that at the CVS-ADC(3) level, the results are not further improved compared to CVS-ADC(2)-x and experimental data, because the fortuitous error compensation inherent in the CVS-ADC(2)-x approach is broken. While CVS-ADC(3) overestimates the core excitation energies on average by 0.61% ± 0.31%, CVS-ADC(2)-x provides an averaged underestimation of -0.22% ± 0.12%. Eventually, the best agreement with experiments can be achieved using the CVS-ADC(2)-x method in combination with a diffuse cartesian basis set at least at the triple-ζ level.

Year:  2015        PMID: 26049476     DOI: 10.1063/1.4921841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  3 in total

1.  Vibrational resonant inelastic X-ray scattering in liquid acetic acid: a ruler for molecular chain lengths.

Authors:  Viktoriia Savchenko; Iulia Emilia Brumboiu; Victor Kimberg; Michael Odelius; Pavel Krasnov; Ji-Cai Liu; Jan-Erik Rubensson; Olle Björneholm; Conny Såthe; Johan Gråsjö; Minjie Dong; Annette Pietzsch; Alexander Föhlisch; Thorsten Schmitt; Daniel McNally; Xingye Lu; Sergey P Polyutov; Patrick Norman; Marcella Iannuzzi; Faris Gel'mukhanov; Victor Ekholm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  XABOOM: An X-ray Absorption Benchmark of Organic Molecules Based on Carbon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen 1s → π* Transitions.

Authors:  Thomas Fransson; Iulia E Brumboiu; Marta L Vidal; Patrick Norman; Sonia Coriani; Andreas Dreuw
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Accurate Spectral Properties within Double-Hybrid Density Functional Theory: A Spin-Scaled Range-Separated Second-Order Algebraic-Diagrammatic Construction-Based Approach.

Authors:  Dávid Mester; Mihály Kállay
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.