Literature DB >> 26049259

Oral tylosin administration is associated with an increase of faecal enterococci and lactic acid bacteria in dogs with tylosin-responsive diarrhoea.

Susanne Kilpinen1, Merja Rantala2, Thomas Spillmann2, Johanna Björkroth3, Elias Westermarck2.   

Abstract

The term tylosin-responsive diarrhoea (TRD) is used for canine recurrent diarrhoea cases for which no underlying cause can be found after extensive diagnostic investigations, but which show a response to the antibiotic tylosin in a few days. The objective of this prospective, one-arm longitudinal trial was to assess the effects of oral tylosin administration on the faecal levels of potentially probiotic bacteria, such as Enterococcus spp. and lactic acid bacteria (LAB), in dogs with TRD. This trial included 14 client-owned suspected TRD dogs that were on tylosin treatment and had firm faeces. Treatment was then terminated and dogs were followed up for up to 2 months to determine the recurrence of diarrhoea. Once diarrhoea started, dogs received tylosin (orally, 25 mg/kg, once daily for 7 days). At the end of the treatment period, stools were firm again in 11 dogs (TRD dogs); three dogs continued having diarrhoea and were excluded from the study. Faecal samples were collected at all three time-points for culture of LAB and enterococci. In TRD dogs, the colony counts of Enterococcus spp. (P = 0.003), LAB (P = 0.037), tylosin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (P <0.001) and LAB (P <0.001) were significantly higher when the dogs were on tylosin treatment and had normal faecal consistency compared to when they had diarrhoea following discontinuation of tylosin. In conclusion, cessation of diarrhoea in TRD dogs with tylosin treatment could be mediated by selection of a specific lactic acid population, the Enterococcus spp., due to their potential probiotic properties.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic-responsive diarrhoea; Dog; Enterococcus; Probiotic; Tylosin resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26049259     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Gastrointestinal Microbiome: A Review.

Authors:  P C Barko; M A McMichael; K S Swanson; D A Williams
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Evaluation of a therapy for Idiopathic Chronic Enterocolitis in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and linked microbial community correlates.

Authors:  Joshua M Taylor; Erik L Clarke; Kate Baker; Abigail Lauder; Dorothy Kim; Aubrey Bailey; Gary D Wu; Ronald G Collman; Lara Doyle-Meyers; Kasi Russell-Lodrigue; James Blanchard; Frederic D Bushman; Rudolf Bohm
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Evaluation of a structured individualised protocol as a potential cost-effective diagnostic and therapeutic approach to chronic diarrhoea in the dog.

Authors:  Christine E Bryan; Jeb C Cade; Andrew J Mackin; Alyssa M Sullivant
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-11

4.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Effects of Tylosin on the Composition and Metabolism of Canine Fecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Carlo Pinna; Carla Giuditta Vecchiato; Monica Grandi; Ludovica Maria Eugenia Mammi; Claudio Stefanelli; Giacomo Biagi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  State-of-the-Art of the Nutritional Alternatives to the Use of Antibiotics in Humans and Monogastric Animals.

Authors:  Vittorio Saettone; Ilaria Biasato; Elisabetta Radice; Achille Schiavone; Domenico Bergero; Giorgia Meineri
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Microbiota and epigenetics: promising therapeutic approaches?

Authors:  Amr El-Sayed; Mohamed Kamel; Lotfi Aleya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Clinical evaluation and microbiota analysis in 9 dogs with antibiotic-responsive enteropathy: A prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Enrico Bottero; Riccardo Ferriani; Elena Benvenuti; Pietro Ruggiero; Simona Astorina; Marco Giraldi; Loris Bertoldi; Giuseppe Benvenuto; Eleonora Sattin; Paola Gianella; Jan S Suchodolski
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.175

8.  Long-term impact of tylosin on fecal microbiota and fecal bile acids of healthy dogs.

Authors:  Alison C Manchester; Craig B Webb; Amanda B Blake; Fatima Sarwar; Jonathan A Lidbury; Jörg M Steiner; Jan S Suchodolski
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.333

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.