Literature DB >> 26048719

An assessment of image distortion and CT number accuracy within a wide-bore CT extended field of view.

B Beeksma1, D Truant, L Holloway, S Arumugam.   

Abstract

Although wide bore computed tomography (CT) scanners provide increased space for patients, the scan field of view (sFOV) remains considerably smaller than the bore size. Consequently, patient anatomy which spans beyond the sFOV is truncated and the information is lost. As a solution, some manufacturers provide the capacity to reconstruct CT images from a partial dataset at an extended field of view (eFOV). To assess spatial distortion within this eFOV three phantoms were considered a 30 × 30 × 20 cm(3) slab of solid water, the Gammex electron density CT phantom and a female anthropomorphic phantom. For each phantom, scans were taken centrally within the sFOV as a reference image and with the phantom edge extended at 1 cm intervals from 0 to 5 cm beyond the sFOV into the eFOV. To assess CT number accuracy various tissue equivalent materials were scanned in the eFOV and resulting CT numbers were compared to inserts scanned within the sFOV. For all phantom geometries, objects within the eFOV were geometrically overestimated with elongation of phantom shapes into the eFOV. The percentage increase in size ranged from 0.22 to 15.94 % over all phantoms considered. The difference between eFOV and sFOV CT numbers was dependent upon insert density. The eFOV underestimated CT numbers in the range of -127 to -230 HU for soft tissue densities and -278 to -640 for bone densities. This trend reversed for low tissue densities with the CT numbers in the eFOV being overestimated by 100-130 HU for lung equivalent inserts. Initial correlation between eFOV and sFOV CT numbers was seen and a correction function was successfully applied to better estimate the CT number representative of that seen within the sFOV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26048719     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-015-0353-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  5 in total

1.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Technical challenges of imaging & image-guided interventions in obese patients.

Authors:  Raul N Uppot
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of the high definition field of view option of a large-bore computed tomography scanner for radiation therapy simulation.

Authors:  Richard Y Wu; Tyler D Williamson; Narayan Sahoo; Trang Nguyen; Shane M Ikner; Amy Y Liu; Paul G Wisdom; MingFu Lii; Rachel A Hunter; Paola E Alvarez; G Brandon Gunn; Steven J Frank; Yoshifumi Hojo; X Ronald Zhu; Michael T Gillin
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-03-26

4.  Impact of computed tomography (CT) reconstruction kernels on radiotherapy dose calculation.

Authors:  Irina Vergalasova; Michael McKenna; Ning Jeff Yue; Meral Reyhan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Risk Assessment-Oriented Design of a Needle Insertion Robotic System for Non-Resectable Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Bogdan Gherman; Nadim Al Hajjar; Paul Tucan; Corina Radu; Calin Vaida; Emil Mois; Alin Burz; Doina Pisla
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.