Literature DB >> 26048693

Technologies that affect the weaning rate in beef cattle production systems.

Matheus Dhein Dill1,2, Gabriel Ribas Pereira3, João Batista Gonçalves Costa3, Leonardo Canali Canellas3, Vanessa Peripolli4, José Braccini Neto3, Danilo Menezes Sant'Anna5, Concepta McManus4, Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos6,3.   

Abstract

We investigated the differences between weaning rates and technologies adopted by farmers in cow-calf production systems in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Interviews were carried out with 73 farmers about 48 technologies that could affect reproductive performance. Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis using a non-hierarchical cluster method. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Three distinct clusters of farmers were created (R (2) = 0.90), named as low (LWR), intermediate (IWR), and high (HWR) weaning rate, with 100, 91, and 96 % of the farmers identified within their respective groups and average weaning rates of 59, 72, and 83 %, respectively. IWR and HWR farmers used more improved natural pasture, fixed-time artificial insemination, selection for birth weight, and proteinated salt compared to LWR. HWR farmers used more stocking rate control, and IWR farmers used more ultrasound to evaluate reproductive performance compared to the LWR group. IWR and HWR adopted more technologies related to nutrition and reproductive aspects of the herd in comparison to LWR. We concluded that farmers with higher technology use on farm had higher weaning rates which could be used to benefit less efficient farmers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef cattle production; Livestock; Management; Technology adoption

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26048693     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-015-0856-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  9 in total

Review 1.  Synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle.

Authors:  G A Bó; P S Baruselli
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Physiology and Endocrinology Symposium: Nutritional aspects of developing replacement heifers.

Authors:  R N Funston; J L Martin; D M Larson; A J Roberts
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Strategic supplementation of calcium salts of polyunsaturated fatty acids to enhance reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows.

Authors:  C N Lopes; R F Cooke; M M Reis; R F G Peres; J L M Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Alpharma Beef Cattle Nutrition Symposium: implications of nutritional management for beef cow-calf systems.

Authors:  R N Funston; A F Summers; A J Roberts
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The use of crossbreeding with beef bulls in dairy herds: effects on calving difficulty and gestation length.

Authors:  R Fouz; F Gandoy; M L Sanjuán; E Yus; F J Diéguez
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Factors affecting dystocia in cattle.

Authors:  D Zaborski; W Grzesiak; I Szatkowska; A Dybus; M Muszynska; M Jedrzejczak
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.005

Review 7.  Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers.

Authors:  M G Diskin; D A Kenny
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Resynchronization with unknown pregnancy status using progestin-based timed artificial insemination protocol in beef cattle.

Authors:  M F Sá Filho; M O Marques; R Girotto; F A Santos; R V Sala; J P Barbuio; P S Baruselli
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Why Do So Many Calves Die on Modern Dairy Farms and What Can We Do about Calf Welfare in the Future?

Authors:  John F Mee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.