Literature DB >> 2604865

Differential effects of chromium(VI) on constitutive and inducible gene expression in chick embryo liver in vivo and correlation with chromium(VI)-induced DNA damage.

J W Hamilton1, K E Wetterhahn.   

Abstract

The effect of DNA damage induced by the carcinogen chromium(VI) on the function of DNA as a template for transcription of constitutive and inducible genes was examined in chick embryo liver in vivo. Changes in gene expression, determined using solution hybridization and northern blot analyses to measure steady-state mRNA levels and a nuclear run-off assay to measure gene transcription rates, were compared to chromium-DNA binding and to chromium(VI)-induced DNA damage as previously measured by DNA alkaline elution. Chromium(VI) treatment had little or no effect on either the steady-state mRNA levels or the transcription rates of the constitutively expressed genes for albumin, conalbumin (avian transferrin), or beta-actin. In contrast, chromium(VI) treatment had significant but opposite effects on the basal and drug-inducible expression of 5-aminolevulinate synthase and cytochrome PB1 P450. The changes in steady-state expression of these two inducible genes were similar to the changes in transcription rate, indicating that the effects of chromium were principally transcriptional. Chromium(VI) treatment increased the basal expression of both inducible genes four- to fivefold at maximum, and the time course of this effect was similar to the time course for chromium(VI)-induced DNA damage and repair. In contrast, chromium(VI) pretreatment suppressed by 60-70% at maximum the subsequent induction of these genes by glutethimide, a phenobarbital analog, and the time course of this effect also corresponded to that of chromium(VI)-induced DNA damage and repair. The time courses of the changes in expression of these genes were bimodal, with the second peak corresponding closely to that of chromium(VI)-induced DNA cross-links. However, the first peak occurred during a period when no DNA cross-links or strand breaks were detectable by alkaline elution, although significant levels of chromium were bound to DNA. This suggests that chromium(VI), like cisplatin, may initially produce a DNA monoadduct that subsequently leads to DNA cross-link formation and that both types of chromium(VI)-induced lesions have a significant effect on the expression of targeted genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2604865     DOI: 10.1002/mc.2940020508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Carcinog        ISSN: 0899-1987            Impact factor:   4.784


  22 in total

1.  Mechanisms of chromium-induced suppression of RNA synthesis in cellular and cell-free systems: relationship to RNA polymerase arrest.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Francis C R Manning; Travis J O'Brien; Susan Ceryak; Steven R Patierno
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Chromium genotoxicity: A double-edged sword.

Authors:  Kristen P Nickens; Steven R Patierno; Susan Ceryak
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 3.  Mutagenic and carcinogenic actions of chromium and its compounds.

Authors:  Arstan Abdramanovich Mamyrbaev; Timur Agataevich Dzharkenov; Zina Amangalievna Imangazina; Umit Abulkhairovna Satybaldieva
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 4.  Chromium exposure disrupts chromatin architecture upsetting the mechanisms that regulate transcription.

Authors:  Hesbon A Zablon; Andrew VonHandorf; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-04-01

5.  Differential effects of mitomycin C and doxorubicin on P-glycoprotein expression.

Authors:  R Maitra; P A Halpin; K H Karlson; R L Page; D Y Paik; M O Leavitt; B D Moyer; B A Stanton; J W Hamilton
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Different roles of ROS and Nrf2 in Cr(VI)-induced inflammatory responses in normal and Cr(VI)-transformed cells.

Authors:  Ram Vinod Roy; Poyil Pratheeshkumar; Yong-Ok Son; Lei Wang; John Andrew Hitron; Sasidharan Padmaja Divya; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Chromium disrupts chromatin organization and CTCF access to its cognate sites in promoters of differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Andrew VonHandorf; Francisco Javier Sánchez-Martín; Jacek Biesiada; Hongxia Zhang; Xiang Zhang; Mario Medvedovic; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Cr(VI)-stimulated STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation in human airway epithelial cells requires Lck.

Authors:  Kimberley A O'Hara; Rasilaben J Vaghjiani; Antonia A Nemec; Linda R Klei; Aaron Barchowsky
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 9.  Genetic and cellular mechanisms in chromium and nickel carcinogenesis considering epidemiologic findings.

Authors:  Arthur Chiu; A J Katz; Jefferson Beaubier; Nancy Chiu; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) is essential for chromium silencing of gene induction in human airway epithelial cells.

Authors:  Antonia A Nemec; Aaron Barchowsky
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.