Literature DB >> 26048437

Comparisons of the efficacy of glucose control, lipid profile, and β-cell function between DPP-4 inhibitors and AGI treatment in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis.

Xiaoling Cai1, Wenjia Yang1, Lingli Zhou1, Simin Zhang1, Xueyao Han1, Linong Ji2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes through a meta-analysis. Studies were identified by a literature search of Medline, Embase, and others from the time that recording commenced until December 2014. The meta-analysis was performed by computing the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for a change from baseline to the study endpoint for DPP-4 inhibitors versus AGIs. Nine randomized controlled trial were judged to be appropriate for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One thousand and forty-six patients were treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor, while 929 patients were treated with AGI treatment; the groups had a comparable baseline body mass index of 25.5 ± 1.3 kg/m(2) and mean baseline HbA1c of 7.83 ± 0.53 %. Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors led to a significantly greater change from baseline in the HbA1c levels (WMD -0.30 %; 95 % CI -0.47 to -0.13 %, p < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD -0.50 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.89 to -0.11 mmol/L, p = 0.01) compared with AGI treatment. Compared with AGIs, treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater increase in the weight change from baseline (WMD 0.89 kg; 95 % CI 0.53-1.25, p < 0.001). Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater increase in the fasting insulin level from baseline (WMD 0.63 µU/mL; 95 % CI 0.35-0.90 µU/mL, p < 0.001). DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved homeostatic model assessment for β-cell function in type 2 diabetes patients compared with AGI treatment (WMD 5.43; 95 % CI 1.01-9.85, p = 0.02). DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a significantly greater decrease in the cholesterol (CHO) level (WMD -0.19 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.19 to -0.19 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and a significantly greater decrease in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level (WMD -0.16 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.26 to -0.05 mmol/L, p = 0.003). Compared with AGIs (813 participants), treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (1031 participants) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of drug-related adverse event (OR 0.48; 95 % CI 0.36-0.64, p < 0.0001). The efficacy of glucose control and improvement of β-cell function, as well as total CHO and LDL-C decreases, in DPP-4 inhibitor treatment were superior to those with AGI treatment, and there was a lower incidence of drug-related AE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DPP-4 inhibitors; HOMA-β; HbA1c; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; α-Glucosidase inhibitors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26048437     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-015-0653-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  27 in total

Review 1.  Multifactorial intervention in Type 2 diabetes: the promise of incretin-based therapies.

Authors:  F Giorgino; A Leonardini; A Natalicchio; L Laviola
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Efficacy of dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors and impact on β-cell function in Asian and Caucasian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoling Cai; Xueyao Han; Yingying Luo; Linong Ji
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.006

3.  Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging comparison with placebo, followed by a long-term extension study.

Authors:  Yutaka Seino; Tetsuya Fujita; Shinzo Hiroi; Masashi Hirayama; Kohei Kaku
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.580

4.  Comparison of vildagliptin and acarbose monotherapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial.

Authors:  C Pan; W Yang; J P Barona; Y Wang; M Niggli; P Mohideen; Y Wang; J E Foley
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 5.  Effects on lipid profile of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, pioglitazone, acarbose, and sulfonylureas: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Matteo Monami; Valentina Vitale; Maria Luisa Ambrosio; Nadia Bartoli; Giulia Toffanello; Benedetta Ragghianti; Francesca Monami; Niccolò Marchionni; Edoardo Mannucci
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  GLP-1: physiological effects and potential therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Kasper Aaboe; Thure Krarup; Sten Madsbad; Jens Juul Holst
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  Inhibition of gastric inhibitory polypeptide signaling prevents obesity.

Authors:  Kazumasa Miyawaki; Yuichiro Yamada; Nobuhiro Ban; Yu Ihara; Katsushi Tsukiyama; Heying Zhou; Shimpei Fujimoto; Akira Oku; Kinsuke Tsuda; Shinya Toyokuni; Hiroshi Hiai; Wataru Mizunoya; Tohru Fushiki; Jens Juul Holst; Mitsuhiro Makino; Akira Tashita; Yukari Kobara; Yoshiharu Tsubamoto; Takayoshi Jinnouchi; Takahito Jomori; Yutaka Seino
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Incretin effects on β-cell function, replication, and mass: the human perspective.

Authors:  Alan J Garber
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin and voglibose in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.

Authors:  Y Iwamoto; A Kashiwagi; N Yamada; S Terao; N Mimori; M Suzuki; H Tachibana
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Comparisons of the efficacy of alpha glucosidase inhibitors on type 2 diabetes patients between Asian and Caucasian.

Authors:  Xiaoling Cai; Xueyao Han; Yingying Luo; Linong Ji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Omarigliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Xueying Tan
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Meta-analysis and critical review on the efficacy and safety of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in Asian and non-Asian populations.

Authors:  Xueying Gao; Xiaoling Cai; Wenjia Yang; Yifei Chen; Xueyao Han; Linong Ji
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.232

3.  Suppression of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation in Mice by Teneligliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yusuke Takahara; Tomotake Tokunou; Toshihiro Ichiki
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.928

4.  Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Chunhong Shi; Ru Zhang; Ran Bai; Dan Liu; Yongbo Wang; Xueyang Zhang; Hao Wang; Jianling Du
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Acarbose With Comparable Glucose-Lowering but Superior Weight-Loss Efficacy to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Shishi Xu; Lizhi Tang; Xiaohui Pan; Nanwei Tong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.