Tora Hammar1, Bodil Lidström2, Göran Petersson3, Yngve Gustafson4, Birgit Eiermann2,5. 1. Department of Medicine and Optometry, eHealth Institute, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden. tora.hammar@lnu.se. 2. Swedish eHealth Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Medicine and Optometry, eHealth Institute, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden. 4. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 5. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug-related problems cause suffering for patients and substantial costs. Multi-dose drug dispensing is a service in which patients receive their medication packed in bags with one unit for each dose occasion. The electronic expert support system (EES) is a clinical decision support system that provides alerts if potential drug-related problems are detected among a patients' current prescriptions, including drug-drug interactions, therapy duplications, high doses, drug-disease interactions, drug gender warnings, and inappropriate drugs and doses for geriatric or pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore physicians' views on the clinical relevance of alerts provided by EES. Furthermore we investigated if physicians performed any changes in drug treatment following the alerts and if there were any differences in perceived relevance and performed changes between different types of alerts and drugs. SETTING: Two geriatric clinics and three primary care units in Sweden. METHOD: Prescribed medications for patients (n = 254) with multi-dose drug dispensing were analyzed for potential drug-related problems using EES. For each alert, a physician assessed clinical relevance and indicated any intended action. A total of 15 physicians took part in the study. Changes in drug treatment following the alerts were later measured. The relationship between variables was analyzed using Chi square test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Physicians' perceived clinical relevance of each alert, and changes in drug treatment following the alerts. RESULTS: Physicians perceived 68% (502/740) of EES alerts as clinically relevant and 11% of all alerts were followed by a change in drug treatment. Clinical relevance and likelihood to make changes in drug treatment was related to the alert category and substances involved in the alert. CONCLUSION: In most patients with multi-dose drug dispensing, EES detected potential drug-related problems, with the majority of the alerts regarded as clinically relevant and some followed by measurable changes in drug treatment.
BACKGROUND: Drug-related problems cause suffering for patients and substantial costs. Multi-dose drug dispensing is a service in which patients receive their medication packed in bags with one unit for each dose occasion. The electronic expert support system (EES) is a clinical decision support system that provides alerts if potential drug-related problems are detected among a patients' current prescriptions, including drug-drug interactions, therapy duplications, high doses, drug-disease interactions, drug gender warnings, and inappropriate drugs and doses for geriatric or pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore physicians' views on the clinical relevance of alerts provided by EES. Furthermore we investigated if physicians performed any changes in drug treatment following the alerts and if there were any differences in perceived relevance and performed changes between different types of alerts and drugs. SETTING: Two geriatric clinics and three primary care units in Sweden. METHOD: Prescribed medications for patients (n = 254) with multi-dose drug dispensing were analyzed for potential drug-related problems using EES. For each alert, a physician assessed clinical relevance and indicated any intended action. A total of 15 physicians took part in the study. Changes in drug treatment following the alerts were later measured. The relationship between variables was analyzed using Chi square test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Physicians' perceived clinical relevance of each alert, and changes in drug treatment following the alerts. RESULTS: Physicians perceived 68% (502/740) of EES alerts as clinically relevant and 11% of all alerts were followed by a change in drug treatment. Clinical relevance and likelihood to make changes in drug treatment was related to the alert category and substances involved in the alert. CONCLUSION: In most patients with multi-dose drug dispensing, EES detected potential drug-related problems, with the majority of the alerts regarded as clinically relevant and some followed by measurable changes in drug treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alerts; Clinical decision support systems; Drug-related problems; Geriatric patients; Multi-dose drug dispensing; Relevance; Sweden
Authors: David N Juurlink; Muhammad Mamdani; Alexander Kopp; Andreas Laupacis; Donald A Redelmeier Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K Ann McKibbon; Cynthia Lokker; Steven M Handler; Lisa R Dolovich; Anne M Holbrook; Daria O'Reilly; Robyn Tamblyn; Brian J Hemens; Runki Basu; Sue Troyan; Pavel S Roshanov Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Hanna M Seidling; Ulrike Klein; Matthias Schaier; David Czock; Dirk Theile; Markus G Pruszydlo; Jens Kaltschmidt; Gerd Mikus; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Christopher Huckvale; Josip Car; Masanori Akiyama; Safurah Jaafar; Tawfik Khoja; Ammar Bin Khalid; Aziz Sheikh; Azeem Majeed Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2010-08
Authors: K Ann McKibbon; Cynthia Lokker; Steve M Handler; Lisa R Dolovich; Anne M Holbrook; Daria O'Reilly; Robyn Tamblyn; Brian J Hemens; Runki Basu; Sue Troyan; Pavel S Roshanov; Norman P Archer; Parminder Raina Journal: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) Date: 2011-04
Authors: Birgit A Damoiseaux-Volman; Stephanie Medlock; Delanie M van der Meulen; Jesse de Boer; Johannes A Romijn; Nathalie van der Velde; Ameen Abu-Hanna Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 3.716