Literature DB >> 26047819

The vapor-phase multi-stage CMD test for characterizing contaminant mass discharge associated with VOC sources in the vadose zone: Application to three sites in different lifecycle stages of SVE operations.

M L Brusseau1, J Mainhagu2, C Morrison2, K C Carroll3.   

Abstract

Vapor-phase multi-stage contaminant mass discharge (CMD) tests were conducted at three field sites to measure mass discharge associated with contaminant sources located in the vadose zone. The three sites represent the three primary stages of the soil vapor extraction (SVE) operations lifecycle-pre/initial-SVE, mid-lifecycle, and near-closure. A CMD of 32g/d was obtained for a site at which soil vapor SVE has been in operation for approximately 6years, and for which mass removal is currently in the asymptotic stage. The contaminant removal behavior exhibited for the vapor extractions conducted at this site suggests that there is unlikely to be a significant mass of non-vapor-phase contaminant (e.g., DNAPL, sorbed phase) remaining in the advective domains, and that most remaining mass is likely located in poorly accessible domains. Given the conditions for this site, this remaining mass is hypothesized to be associated with the low-permeability (and higher water saturation) region in the vicinity of the saturated zone and capillary fringe. A CMD of 25g/d was obtained for a site wherein SVE has been in operation for several years but concentrations and mass-removal rates are still relatively high. A CMD of 270g/d was obtained for a site for which there were no prior SVE operations. The behavior exhibited for the vapor extractions conducted at this site suggest that non-vapor-phase contaminant mass (e.g., DNAPL) may be present in the advective domains. Hence, the asymptotic conditions observed for this site most likely derive from a combination of rate-limited mass transfer from DNAPL (and sorbed) phases present in the advective domain as well as mass residing in lower-permeability ("non-advective") regions. The CMD values obtained from the tests were used in conjunction with a recently developed vapor-discharge tool to evaluate the impact of the measured CMDs on groundwater quality.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groundwater; Mass flux; Remediation; SVE; VOC; Vapor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26047819      PMCID: PMC4520789          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  6 in total

1.  Assessing performance and closure for soil vapor extraction: integrating vapor discharge and impact to groundwater quality.

Authors:  Kenneth C Carroll; Mart Oostrom; Michael J Truex; Virginia J Rohay; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Characterization and Remediation of Chlorinated Volatile Organic Contaminants in the Vadose Zone: An Overview of Issues and Approaches.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Kenneth C Carroll; Michael J Truex; David J Becker
Journal:  Vadose Zone J       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.289

3.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Measuring spatial variability of vapor flux to characterize vadose-zone VOC sources: flow-cell experiments.

Authors:  J Mainhagu; C Morrison; M Truex; M Oostrom; M L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Mass removal and low-concentration tailing of trichloroethene in freshly-amended, synthetically-aged, and field-contaminated aquifer material.

Authors:  G R Johnson; D K Norris; M L Brusseau
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  ANALYSIS OF SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION DATA TO EVALUATE MASS-TRANSFER CONSTRAINTS AND ESTIMATE SOURCE-ZONE MASS FLUX.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Virginia Rohay; Michael J Truex
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.019

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Field Study of Soil Vapor Extraction for Reducing Off-Site Vapor Intrusion.

Authors:  Lloyd Stewart; Chris Lutes; Robert Truesdale; Brian Schumacher; John H Zimmerman; Rebecca Connell
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.019

2.  Assessing the Economic and Societal Benefits of SRP-Funded Research.

Authors:  William A Suk; Michelle L Heacock; Brittany A Trottier; Sara M Amolegbe; Maureen D Avakian; Heather F Henry; Danielle J Carlin; Larry G Reed
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  An innovative method for soil vapor extraction to improve extraction and tail gas treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Yang Ding; Yuling Zhang; Zhiqun Deng; Hewei Song; Jili Wang; Haizhao Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.