Literature DB >> 26047036

Emission-based estimation of lung attenuation coefficients for attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR.

Abolfazl Mehranian1, Habib Zaidi.   

Abstract

In standard segmentation-based MRI-guided attenuation correction (MRAC) of PET data on hybrid PET/MRI systems, the inter/intra-patient variability of linear attenuation coefficients (LACs) is ignored owing to the assignment of a constant LAC to each tissue class. This can lead to PET quantification errors, especially in the lung regions. In this work, we aim to derive continuous and patient-specific lung LACs from time-of-flight (TOF) PET emission data using the maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm. The MLAA algorithm was constrained for estimation of lung LACs only in the standard 4-class MR attenuation map using Gaussian lung tissue preference and Markov random field smoothness priors. MRAC maps were derived from segmentation of CT images of 19 TOF-PET/CT clinical studies into background air, lung, soft tissue and fat tissue classes, followed by assignment of predefined LACs of 0, 0.0224, 0.0864 and 0.0975 cm(-1), respectively. The lung LACs of the resulting attenuation maps were then estimated from emission data using the proposed MLAA algorithm. PET quantification accuracy of MRAC and MLAA methods was evaluated against the reference CT-based AC method in the lungs, lesions located in/near the lungs and neighbouring tissues. The results show that the proposed MLAA algorithm is capable of retrieving lung density gradients and compensate fairly for respiratory-phase mismatch between PET and corresponding attenuation maps. It was found that the mean of the estimated lung LACs generally follow the trend of the reference CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) method. Quantitative analysis revealed that the MRAC method resulted in average relative errors of -5.2 ± 7.1% and -6.1 ± 6.7% in the lungs and lesions, respectively. These were reduced by the MLAA algorithm to -0.8 ± 6.3% and -3.3 ± 4.7%, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrated the potential and capability of emission-based methods in deriving patient-specific lung LACs to improve the accuracy of attenuation correction in TOF PET/MR imaging, thus paving the way for their adaptation in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26047036     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/12/4813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review.

Authors:  Yannick Berker; Yusheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Clinical evaluation of TOF versus non-TOF on PET artifacts in simultaneous PET/MR: a dual centre experience.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sangtae Ahn; Florian Wiesinger; M Mehdi Khalighi; Craig S Levin; Andrei H Iagaru; Greg Zaharchuk; Martin Huellner; Gaspar Delso
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Attenuation Correction for Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined PET/MR Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; David D Faul; Niels Oesingmann; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 5.  Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET.

Authors:  Charlotte S van der Vos; Daniëlle Koopman; Sjoerd Rijnsdorp; Albert J Arends; Ronald Boellaard; Jorn A van Dalen; Mark Lubberink; Antoon T M Willemsen; Eric P Visser
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Accurate hybrid template-based and MR-based attenuation correction using UTE images for simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging applications.

Authors:  Jakub Baran; Zhaolin Chen; Francesco Sforazzini; Nicholas Ferris; Sharna Jamadar; Ben Schmitt; David Faul; Nadim Jon Shah; Marian Cholewa; Gary F Egan
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  SUV-quantification of physiological lung tissue in an integrated PET/MR-system: Impact of lung density and bone tissue.

Authors:  Ferdinand Seith; Holger Schmidt; Sergios Gatidis; Ilja Bezrukov; Christina Schraml; Christina Pfannenberg; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Nina Schwenzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  PET/MRI attenuation estimation in the lung: A review of past, present, and potential techniques.

Authors:  Joseph Lillington; Ludovica Brusaferri; Kerstin Kläser; Karin Shmueli; Radhouene Neji; Brian F Hutton; Francesco Fraioli; Simon Arridge; Manuel Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Kris Thielemans; David Atkinson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.