| Literature DB >> 26046361 |
Francesco Massari1, Emilio Bria1, Chiara Ciccarese1, Enrico Munari2, Alessandra Modena1, Valentina Zambonin1, Isabella Sperduti3, Walter Artibani4, Liang Cheng5, Guido Martignoni2, Giampaolo Tortora1, Matteo Brunelli2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, putative prognostic biomarkers have shown limited utility from the clinical perspective for bladder urothelial carcinoma. Herein, the expression of beta-tubulin-3 and c-Myc was evaluated to determine their prognostic potential.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26046361 PMCID: PMC4457798 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1A] c-Myc iperexpression (2+); B] absence of expression of c-Myc.
Fig 2A] strong positive beta-3-tubulin expression versus absence cores B) 2+ beta-3-tubulin expression.
Patients’ characteristics, according to clinicopathological and molecular variables.
| Variables | Number | Rates (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 52 | 70.3 |
| Female | 22 | 29.7 |
| Comorbidity | ||
| Yes | 63 | 85.1 |
| No | 11 | 14.9 |
| Staging | ||
| T1-2 | 19 | 25.7 |
| T3-4 | 51 | 68.9 |
| Unknown | 4 | 5.4 |
| Lymph-nodal status | ||
| Positive | 31 | 41.9 |
| Negative | 19 | 25.7 |
| Unknown | 24 | 32.4 |
| Grading | ||
| G1-2 | 8 | 10.8 |
| G3 | 42 | 56.8 |
| Unknown | 24 | 32.4 |
| Vascular invasion | ||
| Yes | 34 | 45.9 |
| No | 40 | 54.1 |
| Neural infiltration | ||
| Yes | 16 | 21.6 |
| No | 58 | 78.4 |
| Type of surgery | ||
| Cystectomy | 55 | 74.3 |
| TUR | 18 | 24.3 |
| Unknown | 1 | 1.4 |
| C-MYC expression (IHC) | ||
| 0 | 29 | 39.2 |
| 1 | 13 | 17.5 |
| 2 | 4 | 5.5 |
| Unknown | 28 | 37.8 |
| Tubulin expression (IHC) | ||
| 0 | 14 | 18.9 |
| 1 | 15 | 20.2 |
| 2 | 17 | 37.8 |
| Unknown | 28 | 37.8 |
G: grade; TUR: trans-urethral resection; IHC: immunohistochemistry. Among 46 cancer, 36 showed urothelial, 2 squamous, 2 sarcomatoid, 2 micropapillary, 1 squamo-glandular, 1 small cell, 1 nested, 1 plasmocytoid differentiation.
Univariate analysis for Event Free Survival (EFS).
| Factor | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 1.92 | 0.97–3.77 | 0.058 |
| Age | 1.23 | 0.67–1.26 | 0.48 |
| Comorbidity (yes vs no) | 2.16 | 0.67–6.07 | 0.14 |
| Tumor Size (T3-4 vs T1-2) | 1.23 | 0.62–2.44 | 0.53 |
| Nodal involvement (positive vs negative) | 2.19 | 1.02–4.69 | 0.043 |
| Grading (G3 vs G1-2) | 2.04 | 0.78–5.39 | 0.14 |
| Vascular invasion | 1.07 | 0.58–1.96 | 0.83 |
| Neural infiltration | 1.48 | 0.76–2.88 | 0.24 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 1.92 | 0.68–5.40 | 0.21 |
| c-MYC (IHC score 1+/2+ vs0) | 3.05 | 1.29–7.21 | 0.011 |
| Tubulin (IHC score 1+/2+ vs0) | 3.10 | 1.16–8.25 | 0.024 |
vs: versus; G: grade; IHC: immunohistochemistry.
Univariate analysis for Overall Survival (OS).
| Factor | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 1.01 | 0.48–2.12 | 0.97 |
| Age | 2.47 | 1.19–5.12 | 0.015 |
| Comorbidity (yes vs no) | 1.12 | 0.46–2.71 | 0.80 |
| Tumor Size (T3-4 vs T1-2) | 1.48 | 0.66–3.31 | 0.33 |
| Nodal involvement (positive vs negative) | 3.11 | 1.04–9.31 | 0.042 |
| Grading (G3 vs G1-2) | 7.73 | 1.01–15.9 | 0.049 |
| Vascular invasion | 1.33 | 0.68–2.62 | 0.40 |
| Neural infiltration | 1.14 | 0.51–2.53 | 0.73 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 1.65 | 0.50–5.41 | 0.40 |
| c-MYC (IHC score 1+/2+ vs0) | 2.94 | 1.23–7.01 | 0.015 |
| Tubulin (IHC score 1+/2+ vs0) | 2.06 | 0.89–4.96 | 0.10 |
vs: versus; G: grade; IHC: immunohistochemistry.
Fig 3Unudjested Kaplan-Meier curves for Event-free Survival (A) and Overall Survival (B) according to c-Myc.
Fig 4Unudjested Kaplan-Meier curves for Event-free Survival (A) and Overall Survival (B) according to beta-3-tubulin.
Fig 5Unudjested Kaplan-Meier curves for Event-free Survival (A) and Overall Survival (B) according to the combination of c-Myc and beta-3-tubulin.
Outcome results according to tumor size and nodal involvement.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| T 1–2 | Negative | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. |
| Positive | n.e. | n.e. | |||
| T 3–4 | Negative | 41.7 | 0.13 | 40.0 | 0.38 |
| Positive | 15.7 | 12.6 | |||
| Node-negative | Negative | 66.7 | 0.05 | 40.0 | 0.32 |
| Positive | 12.5 | 0.0 | |||
| Node-positive | Negative | 20.8 | 0.98 | 40.0 | 0.77 |
| Positive | 20.6 | 14.0 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| T 1–2 | Negative | 33.3 | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. |
| Positive | n.e. | n.e. | |||
| T 3–4 | Negative | 34.5 | 0.07 | 34.5 | 0.07 |
| Positive | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Node-negative | Negative | 33.8 | 0.72 | 50.0 | n.e |
| Positive | 0.0 | n.e. | |||
| Node-positive | Negative | 26.0 | 0.79 | 31.8 | 0.90 |
| Positive | 0.0 | 0.0 |
DFS: disease free survival; OS: overall survival; yrs: years; n.e.: not evaluable (too few patients).