| Literature DB >> 26045952 |
Luz Eneida Ochoa1, Luiz Henrique G Pereira2, Guilherme Jose Costa-Silva1, Fábio F Roxo1, Jacqueline S Batista3, Kyara Formiga3, Fausto Foresti1, Claudio Oliveira1.
Abstract
Brachyplatystoma platynemum is a catfish species widely distributed in the Amazon basin. Despite being considered of little commercial interest, the decline in other fish populations has contributed to the increase in the catches of this species. The structure, population genetic variability, and evolutionary process that have driven the diversification of this species are presently unknown. Considering that, in order to better understand the genetic structure of this species, we analyzed individuals from seven locations of the Amazon basin using eight molecular markers: control region and cytochrome b mtDNA sequences, and a set of six nuclear microsatellite loci. The results show high levels of haplotype diversity and point to the occurrence of two structured populations (Amazon River and the Madeira River) with high values for F ST. Divergence time estimates based on mtDNA indicated that these populations diverged about 1.0 Mya (0.2-2.5 Mya 95% HPD) using cytochrome b and 1.4 Mya (0.2-2.7 Mya 95% HPD) using control region. During that time, the influence of climate changes and hydrological events such as sea level oscillations and drainage isolation as a result of geological processes in the Pleistocene may have contributed to the current structure of B. platynemum populations, as well as of differences in water chemistry in Madeira River. The strong genetic structure and the time of genetic divergence estimated for the groups may indicate the existence of strong structure populations of B. platynemum in the Amazon basin.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiversity; Madeira River; Neotropical fishes; climate oscillation; marine transgression; phylogeography
Year: 2015 PMID: 26045952 PMCID: PMC4449755 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Hypothesis of marine transgression and regression in South America platform modified from Miller et al. (2005) and Ramos and Aleman (2000), and based on ideas of Hubert and Renno (2006) about marine transgression affecting the ichthyofauna composition of Amazon rivers. Black arrows indicated the three main lowland points in South America continent where sea can invade. Red arrows represent the fish migration to high lands in periods of marine transgression and migration to low land in marine regression.
Figure 2Sampling sites of Brachyplatystoma platynemum; AIP – Iquitos; PR – Purus River; UTM – Upstream Teotônio; TRM – Teotônio rapids; DTM – Downstream Teotônio; AMA – Manaus; ABE – Belém.
Description of sample sites and number of samples analyzed for each molecular marker
| Locations | Abbreviation | Basin |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iquitos | AIP | Amazonas | 3°43′39.65″S | 30 | 27 | 27 | 30 |
| 73°12′52.38″O | |||||||
| Rio Purus | PR | Purus | 5°50′22.03″S | 38 | 31 | 30 | 38 |
| 64°18′31.17″O | |||||||
| Manaus | AMA | Amazonas | 3°6′23.07″S | 32 | 32 | 22 | 30 |
| 60°1′35.15″O | |||||||
| Upstream Teotônio | UTM | Madeira | 9°7′41.85″S | 22 | 22 | 8 | 20 |
| 64°38′60.00″O | |||||||
| Teotônio rapids | TRM | Madeira | 8°46′60.00″S | 40 | 35 | 24 | 33 |
| 63°55′0.00″O | |||||||
| Downstream Teotônio | DTM | Madeira | 7°51′39.94″S | 34 | 34 | 12 | 18 |
| 63°17′16.42″S | |||||||
| Belém | ABE | Amazonas | 2°26′21.97″S | 35 | 35 | 17 | 0 |
| 54°41′55.45″O | |||||||
mtDNA control region (CR) and cytochrome B (Cyt b) genetic diversity of Brachyplatystoma platynemum estimated for each site
| Sites |
|
| PH |
|
|
| Tajima'D | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | Cyt b | CR | Cyt b | CR | Cyt b | CR | Cyt b | CR | Cyt b | CR | Cyt b | CR | Cytb | |
| AIP | 27 | 27 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 0.895 | 0.738 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.312 | 1.421 |
| RP | 31 | 30 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 0.893 | 0.545 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 1.313 | 0.812 |
| UTM | 22 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 0.900 | 0.893 | 0.008 | 0.004 | 0.114 | −0.644 |
| TRM | 35 | 24 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 13 | 0.635 | 0.757 | 0.005 | 0.002 | −1.446 | −1.234 |
| DTM | 34 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 11 | 0.859 | 0.833 | 0.008 | 0.004 | 0.020 | 0.581 |
| AMA | 32 | 22 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 20 | 7 | 0.915 | 0.597 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.704 | −0.711 |
| ABE | 35 | 17 | 17 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 21 | 6 | 0.906 | 0.625 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.625 | −0.575 |
N, individuals; H, haplotypes; PH, private haplotypes; S, polymorphic sites; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; Tajima'D, Tajima's D test.
Figure 3Brachyplatystoma platynemum statistical parsimony haplotype network for each mitochondrial marker (A) cytochrome b and (B) control region (CR). Circles size is proportional to the number of samples within a given haplotype. Circles are colored to reflect frequency of the haplotype in each designed geographic region (sampling sites). Black circles represent inferred mutational steps between haplotypes.
FST pairwise for Brachyplatystoma platynemum using control region (above) and cytochrome b (down). Significant values in bold (P < 0.002)
| AMA | AIQ | RP | UTM | TRM | DTM | ABE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMA | 0.027 | 0.025 | 0.005 | ||||
| AIQ | 0.013 | 0.065 | 0.027 | ||||
| PR | 0.114 | 0.046 | 0.142 | ||||
| UTM | 0.009 | −0.017 | |||||
| TRM | 0.011 | 0.015 | |||||
| DTM | −0.074 | 0.008 | |||||
| ABE | 0.018 | 0.027 | 0.147 |
Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA). Control region (CR) and cytochrome b (Cytb) for Brachyplatystoma platynemum from Amazon and Madeira river groups
| Source of variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among sites | 1 | 514.66/162.13 | 4.84/2.65Va | 65.19 |
| Among sites within groups | 5 | 26.134/10.42 | 0.09/0.05 Vb | 1.20 |
| Within sites | 209/133 | 520.92/148.27 | 2.49/1.11 Vc | 33.60/29.21 |
| Total | 215/139 | 1061.72/320.81 | 7.42/3.82 |
Significant values P < 0.05.
F – statistics (above) and R-statistic (below) pairwise for Brachyplatystoma platynemum estimated with six microsatellites loci. Significant values in bold (P < 0.002)
| AMA | AIQ | PR | UTM | TRM | DTM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMA | – | −0.010 | ||||
| AIQ | −0.039 | – | ||||
| PR | −0.124 | −0.055 | – | |||
| UTM | – | 0.045 | 0.053 | |||
| TRM | 0.047 | 0.075 | 0.033 | 0.066 | – | |
| DTM | 0.089 | 0.026 | 0.019 | – |
Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Brachyplatystoma platynemum for six microsatellites loci analyzed
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Among sites | 46.44/1233.42 | 0.32/8.29 | 15.75 |
| Among sites within groups | 36.13/735.28 | 0.16/2.23 | 7.84 |
| Among individuals within sites | 209.93/9289.55 | 0.19/6.40 | 9.64 |
| Within individuals | 172.50/8552.00 | 1.35/71.52 | 66.76 |
| Total | 464.99/19810.25 | 2.03/88.44 |
FST - 0.157;
RST - 0.093;
P < 0.01.
Figure 4Bayesian clustering for the 6 microsatellite loci estimated in Structure 2.2 for Brachyplatystoma platynemum. (A) estimated LnP(D); (B) delta(k) showing the highest value in a population structure of K - 2; (C) Structure bar plot.
Figure 5Divergence times of groups for Brachyplatystoma platynemum as estimated in BEAST. (A) Control region (Dloop). (B) Cytochrome b. Node bars display the 95% HPD. Time in the axis given millions of year before present. Amazon River group in green, Madeira River group in blue. Bf – B. filamentosum; Bc – B. capapretum; Br – B. rousseauxii.
Figure 6Bayesian skyline plot for each group of Brachyplatystoma platynemum. The black line represents the median value for the log of the population size (log Ne) and the blue lines represent the upper and lower 95% credible intervals. The x-axis measures time in substitutions per site per million years ago.