Yisong Chen1, Jian Huang1, Changdong Hu1, Keqin Hua2. 1. Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai 200011, China. 2. Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai 200011, China ; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases Shanghai 200011, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to detect levels of AGEs and RAGE and SNPs for RAGE in vaginal tissues of women with POP and rats in a repair location, and to explore the relationship between AGEs-RAGE pathway and POP. METHODS: This study involved human vaginal tissues in fornix from 44 women with POP and 46 women without POP who were assigned to pelvic floor reconstruction or LAVH. The proteins of AGEs, collagen I, and RAGE were detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blot with appropriate primary antibodies. The entire RAGE gene of 24 women with POP and 25 controls were sequenced, and SNPs within were detected. Then, sixty 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to abdominal defect were divided into three surgical pelvic floor reconstruction repair groups (n=20/group): A, repair with non-absorable prolene mesh; B, repair with absorbable SIS mesh; and C, a no repair control group. 3, 9, 15, and 21 months after operation, rats were sacrificed and the expression of AGEs, RAGE and collagen I in the tissues of repair location were detected in the various experimental groups. Statistical analysis included comparison of means (Student's t-test) and proportions (Chi-square test or Fisher test). RESULTS: By both immunohistochemistry and Western blot, patients with POP showed higher protein expression of AGEs of POP than controls (P<0.05). In contrast, the expression of collagen I was lower in POP patients than in the control group (P<0.05). No differences in the expression of RAGE between the POP patients and controls were observed (P>0.05). In POP patients, the expression of collagen I decreased particularly in patients≥60 years old (P<0.05), but there were no different in the expression of AGEs and RAGE dependent on age (P>0.05). RAGE gene sequence variance analysis identified 18 variable loci, but only two of these were potential SNPs: rs184003 (1806), rs55640627 (2346) (P<0.05). Both rs184003 and rs55640627 are both intronic variants, indicating that they may not influence the structure of RAGE. In rat surgical repair model, group B showed a greater extent of abdominal prolapse than groups A and C (P<0.05). Consistent with this, the expression of AGEs in group B was higher than groups A and C (P<0.05), and collagen I in group B was lower than the two others, further supporting our notion that AGEs are inversely related to type I collagen content. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study demonstrates that AGEs and RAGE might play important roles in the physiopathology of POP. Further studies are required to explore mechanisms of how AGEs-RAGE pathway may contribute to tissue degeneration and fragility in POP.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to detect levels of AGEs and RAGE and SNPs for RAGE in vaginal tissues of women with POP and rats in a repair location, and to explore the relationship between AGEs-RAGE pathway and POP. METHODS: This study involved human vaginal tissues in fornix from 44 women with POP and 46 women without POP who were assigned to pelvic floor reconstruction or LAVH. The proteins of AGEs, collagen I, and RAGE were detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blot with appropriate primary antibodies. The entire RAGE gene of 24 women with POP and 25 controls were sequenced, and SNPs within were detected. Then, sixty 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to abdominal defect were divided into three surgical pelvic floor reconstruction repair groups (n=20/group): A, repair with non-absorable prolene mesh; B, repair with absorbable SIS mesh; and C, a no repair control group. 3, 9, 15, and 21 months after operation, rats were sacrificed and the expression of AGEs, RAGE and collagen I in the tissues of repair location were detected in the various experimental groups. Statistical analysis included comparison of means (Student's t-test) and proportions (Chi-square test or Fisher test). RESULTS: By both immunohistochemistry and Western blot, patients with POP showed higher protein expression of AGEs of POP than controls (P<0.05). In contrast, the expression of collagen I was lower in POP patients than in the control group (P<0.05). No differences in the expression of RAGE between the POP patients and controls were observed (P>0.05). In POP patients, the expression of collagen I decreased particularly in patients≥60 years old (P<0.05), but there were no different in the expression of AGEs and RAGE dependent on age (P>0.05). RAGE gene sequence variance analysis identified 18 variable loci, but only two of these were potential SNPs: rs184003 (1806), rs55640627 (2346) (P<0.05). Both rs184003 and rs55640627 are both intronic variants, indicating that they may not influence the structure of RAGE. In rat surgical repair model, group B showed a greater extent of abdominal prolapse than groups A and C (P<0.05). Consistent with this, the expression of AGEs in group B was higher than groups A and C (P<0.05), and collagen I in group B was lower than the two others, further supporting our notion that AGEs are inversely related to type I collagen content. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study demonstrates that AGEs and RAGE might play important roles in the physiopathology of POP. Further studies are required to explore mechanisms of how AGEs-RAGE pathway may contribute to tissue degeneration and fragility in POP.
Authors: Judyta K Juranek; Alexey Aleshin; Eileen M Rattigan; Lynne Johnson; Wu Qu; Fei Song; Radha Ananthakrishnan; Nosirudeen Quadri; Shi Du Yan; Ravichandran Ramasamy; Ann Marie Schmidt; Matthew S Geddis Journal: Biochem Insights Date: 2010-09-01
Authors: Kuzhuvelil B Harikumar; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Gautam Sethi; Parmeswaran Diagaradjane; Preetha Anand; Manoj K Pandey; Juri Gelovani; Sunil Krishnan; Sushovan Guha; Bharat B Aggarwal Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: R Sferra; S Pompili; A D'Alfonso; G Sabetta; E Gaudio; G Carta; C Festuccia; A Colapietro; Antonella Vetuschi Journal: J Anat Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Kristina Allen-Brady; John W F Chua; Romana Cuffolo; Marianne Koch; Felice Sorrentino; Rufus Cartwright Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 1.932
Authors: A Vetuschi; A D'Alfonso; R Sferra; D Zanelli; S Pompili; F Patacchiola; E Gaudio; G Carta Journal: Eur J Histochem Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.188