Literature DB >> 26045579

MR Elastography Can Be Used to Measure Brain Stiffness Changes as a Result of Altered Cranial Venous Drainage During Jugular Compression.

A Hatt1, S Cheng2, K Tan3, R Sinkus4, L E Bilston5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Compressing the internal jugular veins can reverse ventriculomegaly in the syndrome of inappropriately low pressure acute hydrocephalus, and it has been suggested that this works by "stiffening" the brain tissue. Jugular compression may also alter blood and CSF flow in other conditions. We aimed to understand the effect of jugular compression on brain tissue stiffness and CSF flow.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The head and neck of 9 healthy volunteers were studied with and without jugular compression. Brain stiffness (shear modulus) was measured by using MR elastography. Phase-contrast MR imaging was used to measure CSF flow in the cerebral aqueduct and blood flow in the neck.
RESULTS: The shear moduli of the brain tissue increased with the percentage of blood draining through the internal jugular veins during venous compression. Peak velocity of caudally directed CSF in the aqueduct increased significantly with jugular compression (P < .001). The mean jugular venous flow rate, amplitude, and vessel area were significantly reduced with jugular compression, while cranial arterial flow parameters were unaffected.
CONCLUSIONS: Jugular compression influences cerebral CSF hydrodynamics in healthy subjects and can increase brain tissue stiffness, but the magnitude of the stiffening depends on the percentage of cranial blood draining through the internal jugular veins during compression—that is, subjects who maintain venous drainage through the internal jugular veins during jugular compression have stiffer brains than those who divert venous blood through alternative pathways. These methods may be useful for studying this phenomenon in patients with the syndrome of inappropriately low-pressure acute hydrocephalus and other conditions.
© 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26045579      PMCID: PMC7965045          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  31 in total

1.  Large strain behaviour of brain tissue in shear: some experimental data and differential constitutive model.

Authors:  L E Bilston; Z Liu; N Phan-Thien
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 2.  Rigid cervical collar and intracranial pressure of patients with severe head injury.

Authors:  Anthony M-H Ho; K Y Fung; Gavin M Joynt; Manoj K Karmakar; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-12

3.  Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited.

Authors:  D Greitz; R Wirestam; A Franck; B Nordell; C Thomsen; F Ståhlberg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Unconfined compression of white matter.

Authors:  Shaokoon Cheng; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain.

Authors:  U Hamhaber; I Sack; S Papazoglou; J Rump; D Klatt; J Braun
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Viscoelastic properties of human cerebellum using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  John Zhang; Michael A Green; Ralph Sinkus; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Low pressure hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly: hysteresis, non-linear dynamics, and the benefits of CSF diversion.

Authors:  M S Lesniak; R E Clatterbuck; D Rigamonti; M A Williams
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain.

Authors:  D Pang; E Altschuler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Changes in superior sagittal sinus pressure in children with head elevation, jugular venous compression, and PEEP.

Authors:  M S Grady; R F Bedford; T S Park
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Design and validation of Segment--freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis.

Authors:  Einar Heiberg; Jane Sjögren; Martin Ugander; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  20 in total

1.  Cardiac-gated steady-state multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: Effect of cerebral arterial pulsation on brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Felix Schrank; Carsten Warmuth; Heiko Tzschätzsch; Bernhard Kreft; Sebastian Hirsch; Jürgen Braun; Thomas Elgeti; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Differences in the Calculated Transvenous Pressure Drop between Chronic Hydrocephalus and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  G A Bateman; A R Bateman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Brain stiffness following recovery in a patient with an episode of low-pressure hydrocephalus: case report.

Authors:  William C Olivero; Arundhati Biswas; Tracey M Wszalek; Bradley P Sutton; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  A transvenous pressure gradient can explain the MR elastography findings in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Grant Alexander Bateman; Alexander Robert Bateman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Reply: A transvenous pressure gradient can explain the MR elastography findings in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Jan Saip Aunan-Diop; Frantz Rom Poulsen
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  A longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography study of murine brain tumors following radiation therapy.

Authors:  Y Feng; E H Clayton; R J Okamoto; J Engelbach; P V Bayly; J R Garbow
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  MR elastography of the brain and its application in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Hypercapnia increases brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Stefan Hetzer; Florian Dittmann; Karl Bormann; Sebastian Hirsch; Axel Lipp; Danny Jj Wang; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics coupled to the global circulation in holistic setting: Mathematical models, numerical methods and applications.

Authors:  Eleuterio Francisco Toro; Morena Celant; Qinghui Zhang; Christian Contarino; Nivedita Agarwal; Andreas Linninger; Lucas Omar Müller
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.648

10.  Internal Jugular Vein Cross-Sectional Area and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pulsatility in the Aqueduct of Sylvius: A Comparative Study between Healthy Subjects and Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Authors:  Clive B Beggs; Christopher Magnano; Pavel Belov; Jacqueline Krawiecki; Deepa P Ramasamy; Jesper Hagemeier; Robert Zivadinov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.