Clarice R Weinberg1, Min Shi2, Lisa A DeRoo3, Olga Basso4, Rolv Skjærven3. 1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, weinber2@niehs.nih.gov. 2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 3. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, and Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Bergen, Norway and. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a common, costly and dangerous pregnancy complication. Seasonality of risk would suggest modifiable causes. METHODS: We examine seasonal effects on preterm birth, using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (2,321,652 births), and show that results based on births are misleading and a fetuses-at-risk approach is essential. In our harmonic-regression Cox proportional hazards model we consider fetal risk of birth between 22 and 37 completed weeks of gestation. We examine effects of both day of year of conception (for early effects) and day of ongoing gestation (for seasonal effects on labour onset) as modifiers of gestational-age-based risk. RESULTS: Naïve analysis of preterm rates across days of birth shows compelling evidence for seasonality (P < 10(-152)). However, the reconstructed numbers of conceptions also vary with season (P < 10(-307)), confounding results by inducing seasonal variation in the age distribution of the fetal population at risk. When we instead properly treat fetuses as the individuals at risk, restrict analysis to pregnancies with relatively accurate ultrasound-based assessment of gestational age (available since 1998) and adjust for socio-demographic factors and maternal smoking, we find modest effects of both time of year of conception and time of year at risk, with peaks for early preterm near early January and early July. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of seasonal effects on preterm birth are demonstrably vulnerable to confounding by seasonality of conception, measurement error in conception dating, and socio-demographic factors. The seasonal variation based on fetuses reveals two peaks for early preterm, coinciding with New Year's Day and the early July beginning of Norway's summer break, and may simply reflect a holiday-related pattern of unintended conception. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2015. This work is written by a US Government employee and is in the public domain in the US.
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a common, costly and dangerous pregnancy complication. Seasonality of risk would suggest modifiable causes. METHODS: We examine seasonal effects on preterm birth, using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (2,321,652 births), and show that results based on births are misleading and a fetuses-at-risk approach is essential. In our harmonic-regression Cox proportional hazards model we consider fetal risk of birth between 22 and 37 completed weeks of gestation. We examine effects of both day of year of conception (for early effects) and day of ongoing gestation (for seasonal effects on labour onset) as modifiers of gestational-age-based risk. RESULTS: Naïve analysis of preterm rates across days of birth shows compelling evidence for seasonality (P < 10(-152)). However, the reconstructed numbers of conceptions also vary with season (P < 10(-307)), confounding results by inducing seasonal variation in the age distribution of the fetal population at risk. When we instead properly treat fetuses as the individuals at risk, restrict analysis to pregnancies with relatively accurate ultrasound-based assessment of gestational age (available since 1998) and adjust for socio-demographic factors and maternal smoking, we find modest effects of both time of year of conception and time of year at risk, with peaks for early preterm near early January and early July. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of seasonal effects on preterm birth are demonstrably vulnerable to confounding by seasonality of conception, measurement error in conception dating, and socio-demographic factors. The seasonal variation based on fetuses reveals two peaks for early preterm, coinciding with New Year's Day and the early July beginning of Norway's summer break, and may simply reflect a holiday-related pattern of unintended conception. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2015. This work is written by a US Government employee and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Mark A Klebanoff; Alison D Gernand; Robert W Platt; W Tony Parks; Janet M Catov; Hyagriv N Simhan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Doris Chou; Ann-Beth Moller; Rajesh Narwal; Alma Adler; Claudia Vera Garcia; Sarah Rohde; Lale Say; Joy E Lawn Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lyndsey A Darrow; Matthew J Strickland; Mitchel Klein; Lance A Waller; W Dana Flanders; Adolfo Correa; Michele Marcus; Paige E Tolbert Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Hannah Blencowe; Anne C C Lee; Simon Cousens; Adil Bahalim; Rajesh Narwal; Nanbert Zhong; Doris Chou; Lale Say; Neena Modi; Joanne Katz; Theo Vos; Neil Marlow; Joy E Lawn Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik T Sørensen; Anders H Riis; Craig J McKinnon; Kenneth J Rothman Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Clarice R Weinberg; Min Shi; Olga Basso; Lisa A DeRoo; Quaker Harmon; Allen J Wilcox; Rolv Skjærven Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Eric Lavigne; Antonio Gasparrini; David M Stieb; Hong Chen; Abdool S Yasseen; Eric Crighton; Teresa To; Scott Weichenthal; Paul J Villeneuve; Sabit Cakmak; Frances Coates; Mark Walker Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Andreas M Neophytou; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Dana E Goin; Kristin C Darwin; Joan A Casey Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Anders Hviid; Anna Laksafoss; Paula Hedley; Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen; Henrik Hjalgrim; Michael Christiansen; Sjurdur Frodi Olsen Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-02-01