Literature DB >> 2604540

Pornography and community standards in Hawaii: comparisons with other states.

M Diamond1, J E Dannemiller.   

Abstract

This first statewide study, using random phone interviews, found a community standard for the acceptance of sexually explicit material. Research shows respondents are conservative in voting for the death penalty and against the legalization of those drugs presently illegal, even marijuana. In other regards, Hawaiians think abortion should be only for the women to decide and that adults should not be denied access to explicit material that shows other adults in consensual sexual acts. The majority of those interviewed had themselves seen erotically explicit materials, often obtaining it themselves. Only a minority found the material offensive. A review of studies on sexually explicit material elsewhere in the country shows these findings to be consistent with all other communities investigated; none would restrict adults from access to sexually explicit material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2604540     DOI: 10.1007/bf01541674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  1 in total

1.  What is obscene? Social science and the contemporary community standard test of obscenity.

Authors:  J E Scott
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1991
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Attitudes of U.S. and Czech/Slovak mental health and health professionals toward five types of sexually explicit materials.

Authors:  B E Robinson; K Scheltema; J Koznar; R Manthei
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1996-12

Review 2.  Homosexuality and bisexuality in different populations.

Authors:  M Diamond
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1993-08

3.  Is there a national standard with respect to attitudes toward sexually explicit media material?

Authors:  C Winick; J T Evans
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.