Mariana Gutierrez1, Isabelle Thiffault2,3, Kether Guerrero4, Gabriel Á Martos-Moreno5,6, Luan T Tran7, William Benko8, Marjo S van der Knaap9, Rosalina M L van Spaendonk10, Nicole I Wolf11, Geneviève Bernard12. 1. Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. mariana.gutierrez@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. isabelle.thiffault@mail.mcgill.ca. 3. Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospitals, 2420 Pershing Rd, suite 421, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA. isabelle.thiffault@mail.mcgill.ca. 4. Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. kether.guerrero@mail.mcgill.ca. 5. Department of Pediatrics & Pediatric Endocrinology, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Instituto de Investigación La Princesa, Madrid, Spain. gabrielangelmartos@yahoo.es. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. gabrielangelmartos@yahoo.es. 7. Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. luan.tran@mail.mcgill.ca. 8. WellSpan Pediatric Neurology, WellSpan Medical Group, York, PA, USA. wbenko@wellspan.org. 9. Department of Child Neurology, VU University Medical Center, and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ms.vanderknaap@vumc.nl. 10. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.vervenne@vumc.nl. 11. Department of Child Neurology, VU University Medical Center, and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.wolf@vumc.nl. 12. Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. genevieve.bernard@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
POLR3-related (or 4H) leukodystrophy is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in POLR3A or POLR3B and is characterized by neurological and non-neurological features. In a small proportion of patients, no mutation in either gene or only one mutation is found. Analysis of the POLR3B cDNA revealed a large deletion of exons 21-22 in one case and of exons 26-27 in another case. These are the first reports of long deletions causing POLR3-related leukodystrophy, suggesting that deletions and duplications in POLR3A or POLR3B should be investigated in patients with a compatible phenotype, especially if one pathogenic variant has been identified.
POLR3-related (or 4H) leukodystrophy is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in POLR3A or POLR3B and is characterized by neurological and non-neurological features. In a small proportion of patients, no mutation in either gene or only one mutation is found. Analysis of the POLR3B cDNA revealed a large deletion of exons 21-22 in one case and of exons 26-27 in another case. These are the first reports of long deletions causing POLR3-related leukodystrophy, suggesting that deletions and duplications in POLR3A or POLR3B should be investigated in patients with a compatible phenotype, especially if one pathogenic variant has been identified.
POLR3-related leukodystrophy or 4H (Hypomyelination, Hypodontia, Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism) leukodystrophy (MIM#607694) is a hypomyelinating leukodystrophy with typical onset in early childhood [1-3]. Neurological features include motor delay or regression, cerebellar and pyramidal features, and, later in the course of the disease, cognitive regression. Non-neurological features include a variety of dental and hormonal abnormalities, and myopia [1, 3]. Brain MRI shows hypomyelination, i.e. variable (hypo-, hyper- or iso- intense) signal on T1-weighted images and hyperintense signal of the white matter on T2-weighted images compared to grey matter structures [4], with relative preservation of myelination (i.e. T2-hypointensity), of specific structures, with or without cerebellar atrophy and thinning of the corpus callosum [3, 5, 6]. 4H is caused by recessive mutations in POLR3A (MIM#614258) [7-10] or POLR3B (MIM#614366), encoding respectively the largest and second largest subunits of the DNA-directed RNA polymerase III (POLR3). POLR3 is responsible for the transcription of transfer RNAs and other small RNAs essential for cellular processes [11]. Amino acid changes in the protein domains of POLR3A or POLR3B suggest a direct interference with DNA binding, a modification of the catalytic cleft structure, or a change in protein interactions of POLR3 subunits [9, 10]. Current knowledge suggests that mutations are uncovered in the vast majority of 4H cases. A small percentage of cases remain negative or have only one mutation after sequencing analysis [3, 8]. To date, no large deletion or duplication has been reported in 4H cases [3, 9].We here report the first large exonic deletions in patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of 4H. The first index patient is a 15-year-old girl, first evaluated by a child neurologist at the age of 19 months for unstable stance and delayed walking. She was born from healthy non-consanguineous parents after a normal pregnancy and delivery. At initial evaluation, the patient had normal height, weight and head circumference. Neurological examination was significant for mild hypotonia as well as truncal ataxia. Patient evolution and annual examinations revealed delayed decidual teeth eruption, slowly progressive gait ataxia and halted pubertal development at Tanner Stage IV with primary amenorrhea. At the time, LHRH stimulation showed lack of LH/FSH pulsatility. The second patient, a boy, was born at term by elective caesarean section after a pregnancy sustained by progesterone in the context of having had three prior miscarriages of unknown cause. Congenital hip dislocation was first treated conservatively, and then corrected surgically. In the second year of life, delay of gross and fine motor skills became obvious. He developed frank ataxia and a mild pyramidal syndrome. Eruption of upper medial incisors was delayed. He developed myopia and short stature. Neurological deterioration led to death at age 8 years. MRI of both patients were compatible with 4Hleukodystrophy.Both patients underwent sequencing of all exons and intron-exon boundaries of POLR3A and POLR3B. Patient 1 was heterozygous for a maternally-inherited variant, c.1568 T > A (p.Val523Glu), located in exon 15 of POLR3B (Figs. 1a and 2c). The Val523Glu have been reported several times in the literature as pathogenic [1]. Patient 2 was apparently homozygous for a missense variant, c.3008A > G (p.Tyr1003Cys), located in exon 26 of POLR3B (Figs. 1b and 2c). Parental testing failed to uncover the Tyr1003Cys in the mother suggesting the presence of a large deletion on the other allele or uniparental isodisomy. No mutation in POLR3A was uncovered in either patient.
Fig. 1
Sanger sequencing of POLR3B genomic coding sequence and segregation analysis in families. a Patient 1 was heterozygous for a maternally-inherited pathogenic variant, c.1568 T > A (p.Val523Glu), located in exon 15 of POLR3B gene. Father was negative for the variant. The Val523Glu variant has not been reported in the general population databases. While not validated for clinical use, multiple in silico analyses predict that this variant is disease-causing. b Patient 2 was found apparently homozygous for a paternally-inherited pathogenic variant, c.3008G > A (p.Tyr1003Cys), located in exon 26 of POLR3B gene. Father was a heterozygous carrier but mother was negative for the variant, suggesting a deletion on the other allele. The Tyr1003Cys variant has not been reported in the general population databases. While not validated for clinical use, multiple in silico analyses predict that this variant is disease-causing
Fig. 2
cDNA amplification and sequencing of fragments encompassing the putative POLR3B exonic deletions. a Patient 1: RNA isolation was performed using standard method and followed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Amplification of the fragment of complement DNA (cDNA) encompassing exons 20 to 23 revealed the presence of a putative deletion. The sequence in the overlapping reading frame were showing a normal cDNA PCR product of 630 bp, covering exons 20 to 23. The second sequence of a reduced product of 353 bp was encompassing exons 20 to 23, suggesting the complete or partial deletion of exons 21 and 22. b Patient 2: RNA isolation was performed using standard method and followed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Amplification of the fragment of complement DNA (cDNA) encompassing the exon 25 to 28 revealed the presence of a putative deletion. The sequence in the overlapping reading frame were showing a normal cDNA PCR product of 634 bp, covering exons 25 to 28. The second sequence of a reduced product of 346 bp was encompassing exons 25 and 28, suggesting the complete or partial deletion of exons 26 and 27. c Scheme depicts the large deletions in POLR3B gene characterized in our index patients with classical clinical and radiological findings of 4H
Sanger sequencing of POLR3B genomic coding sequence and segregation analysis in families. a Patient 1 was heterozygous for a maternally-inherited pathogenic variant, c.1568 T > A (p.Val523Glu), located in exon 15 of POLR3B gene. Father was negative for the variant. The Val523Glu variant has not been reported in the general population databases. While not validated for clinical use, multiple in silico analyses predict that this variant is disease-causing. b Patient 2 was found apparently homozygous for a paternally-inherited pathogenic variant, c.3008G > A (p.Tyr1003Cys), located in exon 26 of POLR3B gene. Father was a heterozygous carrier but mother was negative for the variant, suggesting a deletion on the other allele. The Tyr1003Cys variant has not been reported in the general population databases. While not validated for clinical use, multiple in silico analyses predict that this variant is disease-causingcDNA amplification and sequencing of fragments encompassing the putative POLR3B exonic deletions. a Patient 1: RNA isolation was performed using standard method and followed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Amplification of the fragment of complement DNA (cDNA) encompassing exons 20 to 23 revealed the presence of a putative deletion. The sequence in the overlapping reading frame were showing a normal cDNA PCR product of 630 bp, covering exons 20 to 23. The second sequence of a reduced product of 353 bp was encompassing exons 20 to 23, suggesting the complete or partial deletion of exons 21 and 22. b Patient 2: RNA isolation was performed using standard method and followed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Amplification of the fragment of complement DNA (cDNA) encompassing the exon 25 to 28 revealed the presence of a putative deletion. The sequence in the overlapping reading frame were showing a normal cDNA PCR product of 634 bp, covering exons 25 to 28. The second sequence of a reduced product of 346 bp was encompassing exons 25 and 28, suggesting the complete or partial deletion of exons 26 and 27. c Scheme depicts the large deletions in POLR3B gene characterized in our index patients with classical clinical and radiological findings of 4HFurther studies were conducted in order to uncover exonic deletion in our index patients. In patient 1, RNA analysis revealed the presence of a heterozygous deletion encompassing exons 21 and 22 (Fig. 2a and c). Subsequently, long-range genomic PCR using exon-specific primers for exons 20 and 23, confirmed a ~6Kb paternally-inherited deletion in patient 1 (Figs. 2c and 3a). In patient 2, RNA analysis revealed the presence of a heterozygous deletion encompassing exons 26 and 27 (Fig. 2b and c). Subsequently, long-range genomic PCR using exon-specific primers for exons 25 and 27 respectively, confirmed a ~4Kb maternally-inherited deletion. Since no homology was found at the deletion breakpoints, the POLR3B exonic deletions appear to have arisen by the simple rejoining of non-homologous DNA ends during double stranded break repair.
Fig. 3
Long-Range PCR of the putative POLR3B exonic deletions and sequencing of the breakpoints. a. Patient 1: Long-Range (LR- PCR) was performed on genomic DNA using exon-specific forward and reverse primers for exons 20 and 23 respectively. The expected fragment size of this region was estimated at 10 kb (Control DNA; Lane 2 and U51.2; Lane 5), however the proband LR-PCR amplification generated a smaller DNA fragment with average product length of approximately 3 kb, as indicated by the arrow (U51.0; Lane 3). This 3 kb DNA fragment was also seen in the LR-PCR amplification of paternal DNA (U51.1; Lane 4), but not of maternal DNA (U51.2; Lane 5). Lane 1 is the molecular size marker. Sanger sequencing of the abnormal fragment identified in both the proband and the unaffected father allowed mapping of the breakpoint on the 5’ at position 106, 751, 658 on chromosome 12, and the breakpoint at the 3’ was at position 106, 857, 267 (data not shown). No homology was found at either of the deletion breakpoints. Tandem Repeats finder, QuadParser and Repeat Masker databases were used for sequence motif analysis. These tools failed to identify motif, suggesting that homologous recombination events were unlikely. The exonic deletions of POLR3B appear to have arisen by the simple rejoining of non-homologous DNA ends during double stranded break repair. b. Patient 2: Long-Range (LR- PCR) was performed on genomic DNA using intron-specific forward and reverse primers for introns 25 and 27 respectively. The expected fragment size of this region was estimated at 13 kb (Control DNA; Lane 3), however the proband LR-PCR amplification generated a smaller DNA fragment with average product length of approximately 9 kb, as indicated by the arrow (08D1250; Lane 2). Lane 1 and 4 is the molecular size marker
Long-Range PCR of the putative POLR3B exonic deletions and sequencing of the breakpoints. a. Patient 1: Long-Range (LR- PCR) was performed on genomic DNA using exon-specific forward and reverse primers for exons 20 and 23 respectively. The expected fragment size of this region was estimated at 10 kb (Control DNA; Lane 2 and U51.2; Lane 5), however the proband LR-PCR amplification generated a smaller DNA fragment with average product length of approximately 3 kb, as indicated by the arrow (U51.0; Lane 3). This 3 kb DNA fragment was also seen in the LR-PCR amplification of paternal DNA (U51.1; Lane 4), but not of maternal DNA (U51.2; Lane 5). Lane 1 is the molecular size marker. Sanger sequencing of the abnormal fragment identified in both the proband and the unaffected father allowed mapping of the breakpoint on the 5’ at position 106, 751, 658 on chromosome 12, and the breakpoint at the 3’ was at position 106, 857, 267 (data not shown). No homology was found at either of the deletion breakpoints. Tandem Repeats finder, QuadParser and Repeat Masker databases were used for sequence motif analysis. These tools failed to identify motif, suggesting that homologous recombination events were unlikely. The exonic deletions of POLR3B appear to have arisen by the simple rejoining of non-homologous DNA ends during double stranded break repair. b. Patient 2: Long-Range (LR- PCR) was performed on genomic DNA using intron-specific forward and reverse primers for introns 25 and 27 respectively. The expected fragment size of this region was estimated at 13 kb (Control DNA; Lane 3), however the proband LR-PCR amplification generated a smaller DNA fragment with average product length of approximately 9 kb, as indicated by the arrow (08D1250; Lane 2). Lane 1 and 4 is the molecular size markerThe clinical picture in these patients is typical of 4H. The presence of a deletion together with a missense mutation reiterates the idea that complete loss of POLR3B is lethal [1]. Patients with compound heterozygous mutations have shown no significant differences in the clinical course of deterioration as compared to homozygous affected patients, except for the patients homozygous for the common POLR3B mutation (c.1568 T > A, p.Val523Glu), whose clinical symptoms are significantly milder [3, 10]. This could be, at least partly, attributed to the debilitating effect of the missense mutation on the formation of multiplex complexes [9]. In summary, our findings highlight that multi-modal approaches in mutation screening of POLR3A and POLR3B genes may be required for clinically suspected 4H cases when Sanger sequencing of coding elements is negative or reveals only one mutation.
Ethics and consent statement
The project was approved by the research ethics committee of the Montreal Children Hospital (11–105-PED) and the institutional review board of the VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Netherlands. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients’ legal guardians.
Authors: Hélène Dumay-Odelot; Stéphanie Durrieu-Gaillard; Daniel Da Silva; Robert G Roeder; Martin Teichmann Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Nicole I Wolf; Adeline Vanderver; Rosalina M L van Spaendonk; Raphael Schiffmann; Bernard Brais; Marianna Bugiani; Erik Sistermans; Coriene Catsman-Berrevoets; Johan M Kros; Pedro Soares Pinto; Daniela Pohl; Sandya Tirupathi; Petter Strømme; Ton de Grauw; Sébastien Fribourg; Michelle Demos; Amy Pizzino; Sakkubai Naidu; Kether Guerrero; Marjo S van der Knaap; Geneviève Bernard Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marjan E Steenweg; Adeline Vanderver; Susan Blaser; Alberto Bizzi; Tom J de Koning; Grazia M S Mancini; Wessel N van Wieringen; Frederik Barkhof; Nicole I Wolf; Marjo S van der Knaap Journal: Brain Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Roberta La Piana; Davide Tonduti; Heather Gordish Dressman; Johanna L Schmidt; Jonathan Murnick; Bernard Brais; Genevieve Bernard; Adeline Vanderver Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Roberta La Piana; Ferdy K Cayami; Luan T Tran; Kether Guerrero; Rosalina van Spaendonk; Katrin Õunap; Sander Pajusalu; Tobias Haack; Evangeline Wassmer; Dagmar Timmann; Hanna Mierzewska; Bwee T Poll-Thé; Chirag Patel; Helen Cox; Tahir Atik; Huseyin Onay; Ferda Ozkınay; Adeline Vanderver; Marjo S van der Knaap; Nicole I Wolf; Geneviève Bernard Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mary R Richards; Lacey Plummer; Yee-Ming Chan; Margaret F Lippincott; Richard Quinton; Philip Kumanov; Stephanie B Seminara Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Karine Choquet; Sharon Yang; Robyn D Moir; Diane Forget; Roxanne Larivière; Annie Bouchard; Christian Poitras; Nicolas Sgarioto; Marie-Josée Dicaire; Forough Noohi; Timothy E Kennedy; Joseph Rochford; Geneviève Bernard; Martin Teichmann; Benoit Coulombe; Ian M Willis; Claudia L Kleinman; Bernard Brais Journal: Mol Brain Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 4.041
Authors: Stefanie Perrier; Laurence Gauquelin; Catherine Fallet-Bianco; Megan K Dishop; Mackenzie A Michell-Robinson; Luan T Tran; Kether Guerrero; Lama Darbelli; Myriam Srour; Kevin Petrecca; Deborah L Renaud; Michael Saito; Seth Cohen; Steffen Leiz; Bader Alhaddad; Tobias B Haack; Ingrid Tejera-Martin; Fernando I Monton; Norberto Rodriguez-Espinosa; Daniela Pohl; Savithri Nageswaran; Annette Grefe; Emma Glamuzina; Geneviève Bernard Journal: Neurol Genet Date: 2020-05-11
Authors: Laurence Gauquelin; Ferdy K Cayami; László Sztriha; Grace Yoon; Luan T Tran; Kether Guerrero; François Hocke; Rosalina M L van Spaendonk; Eva L Fung; Stefano D'Arrigo; Gessica Vasco; Isabelle Thiffault; Dmitriy M Niyazov; Richard Person; Kara Stuart Lewis; Evangeline Wassmer; Trine Prescott; Penny Fallon; Meriel McEntagart; Julia Rankin; Richard Webster; Heike Philippi; Bart van de Warrenburg; Dagmar Timmann; Abhijit Dixit; Claire Searle; Nivedita Thakur; Michael C Kruer; Suvasini Sharma; Adeline Vanderver; Davide Tonduti; Marjo S van der Knaap; Enrico Bertini; Cyril Goizet; Sébastien Fribourg; Nicole I Wolf; Geneviève Bernard Journal: Neurol Genet Date: 2019-10-30