Literature DB >> 26044932

Mercury and cortisol in Western Hudson Bay polar bear hair.

T Bechshoft1, A E Derocher, E Richardson, P Mislan, N J Lunn, C Sonne, R Dietz, D M Janz, V L St Louis.   

Abstract

Non-invasive methods of assessing animal health and life history are becoming increasingly popular in wildlife research; hair samples from polar bears (Ursus maritimus), are being used to study an ever broader range of anthropogenic and endocrine compounds. A number of contaminants are known to disrupt endocrine function in polar bears. However, the relationship between mercury and cortisol remains unknown, although mercury is an endocrine disruptor in other species. Here, we examine the relationship between concentrations of cortisol and total mercury (THg) analyzed in guard hair from 378 polar bears (184 females, 194 males) sampled in Western Hudson Bay, 2004-2012. The difference in mean cortisol concentration between female (0.8 ± 0.6 pg/mg) and male (0.7 ± 0.5 pg/mg) polar bears bordered on significance (p = 0.054). However, mean mercury concentration was significantly greater (p = 0.009) in females (4.7 ± 1.4 μg/g) than males (4.3 ± 1.2 μg/g). Hair cortisol in males was significantly influenced by mercury, age, and fatness, as well as interactions between mercury and year, mercury and fatness, and year and fatness (all: p < 0.03) (multiple regression analysis, whole model: r(2) = 0.14, F(7,185) = 4.43, p = 0.0001). Fatness was the only significant variable in the multiple regression analysis for females (r(2) = 0.06, F(1,182) = 13.0, p = 0.0004). In conclusion, a significant, but complex, relationship was found between mercury and cortisol concentrations in hair from male, but not female, polar bears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26044932     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-015-1506-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  41 in total

1.  The corticosterone stress response and mercury contamination in free-living tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor.

Authors:  Melinda D Franceschini; Oksana P Lane; David C Evers; J Michael Reed; Bart Hoskins; L Michael Romero
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Tissue mercury concentrations and adrenocortical responses of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) near a contaminated river.

Authors:  Haruka Wada; David E Yates; David C Evers; Robert J Taylor; William A Hopkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Effects of in vitro exposures to cadmium, mercury, zinc, and 1-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane on steroidogenesis by dispersed interrenal cells of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  V S Leblond; A Hontela
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Mercury-associated DNA hypomethylation in polar bear brains via the LUminometric Methylation Assay: a sensitive method to study epigenetics in wildlife.

Authors:  J Richard Pilsner; Alicia L Lazarus; Dong-Ha Nam; Robert J Letcher; Christian Sonne; Rune Dietz; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  The endocrine effects of mercury in humans and wildlife.

Authors:  Shirlee W Tan; Jesse C Meiller; Kathryn R Mahaffey
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  A study of the effects of methyl mercury, cadmium, arsenic, selenium, and a PCB, (Aroclor 1254) on adrenal and testicular steroidogeneses in vitro, by the gray seal Halichoerus grypus.

Authors:  H C Freeman; G B Sangalang
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Influence of carbon and lipid sources on variation of mercury and other trace elements in polar bears (Ursus maritimus).

Authors:  Heli Routti; Robert J Letcher; Erik W Born; Marsha Branigan; Rune Dietz; Thomas J Evans; Melissa A McKinney; Elizabeth Peacock; Christian Sonne
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Mercury concentrations in Southern Beaufort Sea polar bears: variation based on stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen.

Authors:  Tamara Cardona-Marek; Katrina K Knott; Benjamin E Meyer; Todd M O'Hara
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 9.  Exposure and effects assessment of persistent organohalogen contaminants in arctic wildlife and fish.

Authors:  Robert J Letcher; Jan Ove Bustnes; Rune Dietz; Bjørn M Jenssen; Even H Jørgensen; Christian Sonne; Jonathan Verreault; Mathilakath M Vijayan; Geir W Gabrielsen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Estimating grizzly and black bear population abundance and trend in Banff National Park using noninvasive genetic sampling.

Authors:  Michael A Sawaya; Jeffrey B Stetz; Anthony P Clevenger; Michael L Gibeau; Steven T Kalinowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Non-Invasive Sampling in Wildlife Disease and Health Research: What's New?

Authors:  Anna-Katarina Schilling; Maria Vittoria Mazzamuto; Claudia Romeo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Predictors and immunological correlates of sublethal mercury exposure in vampire bats.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Matthew M Chumchal; Alexandra B Bentz; Steven G Platt; Gábor Á Czirják; Thomas R Rainwater; Sonia Altizer; Daniel G Streicker
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  The quantification of reproductive hormones in the hair of captive adult brown bears and their application as indicators of sex and reproductive state.

Authors:  Marc Cattet; Gordon B Stenhouse; David M Janz; Luciene Kapronczai; Joy Anne Erlenbach; Heiko T Jansen; O Lynne Nelson; Charles T Robbins; John Boulanger
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Do follicles matter? Testing the effect of follicles on hair cortisol levels.

Authors:  Agnieszka Sergiel; Marc Cattet; Luciene Kapronczai; David M Janz; Nuria Selva; Kamil A Bartoń; Jon E Swenson; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.