Marie Yan1, Alexander Kumachev1, Lillian L Siu2, Kelvin K W Chan3. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada. Electronic address: kelvin.chan@sunnybrook.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT-A) is often the regimen of choice in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Many alternative regimens have been reported in the literature, however, it is unknown how effective these regimens are compared to each other due to the lack of direct comparisons. Our objective was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the relative survival benefits of these treatments for locoregionally advanced NPC. METHODS: We performed a systematic review following the Cochrane methodology, using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different chemoradiotherapy regimens for locoregionally advanced NPC. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of interest, and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted using the Parmar method. Bayesian NMAs with random effects were conducted using WinBUGS. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs (5576 patients) were included in this review. All together, these trials compared seven different regimens: radiotherapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), neoadjuvant followed by CRT (N-CRT), CRT-A, RT-A, N-RT and N-RT-A. All regimens that contained CRT performed significantly better than RT. CRT-A did not improve survival compared to CRT alone (0.98; 95% credible regions: 0.71-1.34). For N-CRT versus CRT, the HR was 1.03 (0.69-1.47). When CRT-A was compared against N-CRT, the resulting HR was 0.96 (0.64-1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival following CRT. The efficacies of CRT, CRT-A and N-CRT all appeared to be similar. Further studies are warranted to determine the value of additional chemotherapy phases in specific patient subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT-A) is often the regimen of choice in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Many alternative regimens have been reported in the literature, however, it is unknown how effective these regimens are compared to each other due to the lack of direct comparisons. Our objective was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the relative survival benefits of these treatments for locoregionally advanced NPC. METHODS: We performed a systematic review following the Cochrane methodology, using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different chemoradiotherapy regimens for locoregionally advanced NPC. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of interest, and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted using the Parmar method. Bayesian NMAs with random effects were conducted using WinBUGS. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs (5576 patients) were included in this review. All together, these trials compared seven different regimens: radiotherapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), neoadjuvant followed by CRT (N-CRT), CRT-A, RT-A, N-RT and N-RT-A. All regimens that contained CRT performed significantly better than RT. CRT-A did not improve survival compared to CRT alone (0.98; 95% credible regions: 0.71-1.34). For N-CRT versus CRT, the HR was 1.03 (0.69-1.47). When CRT-A was compared against N-CRT, the resulting HR was 0.96 (0.64-1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival following CRT. The efficacies of CRT, CRT-A and N-CRT all appeared to be similar. Further studies are warranted to determine the value of additional chemotherapy phases in specific patient subgroups.
Authors: Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Mark D Krailo; Matthew J Krasin; Li Huang; M Beth McCarville; John Hicks; Farzana Pashankar; Alberto S Pappo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Federico Rotolo; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Jean Bourhis; Sophie Marguet; Julie Leclercq; Wai Tong Ng; Jun Ma; Anthony T C Chan; Pei-Yu Huang; Guopei Zhu; Daniel T T Chua; Yong Chen; Hai-Qiang Mai; Dora L W Kwong; Yoke Lim Soong; James Moon; Yuk Tung; Kwan-Hwa Chi; George Fountzilas; Li Zhang; Edwin Pun Hui; Anne W M Lee; Pierre Blanchard; Stefan Michiels Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Laureen Ribassin-Majed; Sophie Marguet; Anne W M Lee; Wai Tong Ng; Jun Ma; Anthony T C Chan; Pei-Yu Huang; Guopei Zhu; Daniel T T Chua; Yong Chen; Hai-Qiang Mai; Dora L W Kwong; Shie-Lee Cheah; James Moon; Yuk Tung; Kwan-Hwa Chi; George Fountzilas; Jean Bourhis; Jean Pierre Pignon; Pierre Blanchard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 44.544