Literature DB >> 26044421

Draft Genome Sequences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain PS3 and Citrobacter freundii Strain SA79 Obtained from a Wound Dressing-Associated Biofilm.

Sirwan Akbar1, Simon P Rout1, Paul N Humphreys2.   

Abstract

Two isolates, one from the genus Pseudomonas and the second from Citrobacter, were isolated from a wound dressing-associated biofilm. Following whole-genome sequencing, the two isolates presented genes encoding for resistance to antibiotics and those involved in exopolysaccharide production.
Copyright © 2015 Akbar et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26044421      PMCID: PMC4457058          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00561-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The management of infected wounds is a worldwide health care issue (1), exacerbated by the rise of antimicrobial resistance (2–4). The formation of biofilms within wounds has been implicated in the delayed healing, ineffective treatment, and prolonged infection of chronic wounds (5) through the suppression of the immune system and the reduced impact of antimicrobial agents (5–8). Pseudomonas spp. have previously been identified as both a pathogen and a biofilm-forming organism within a wound environment, particularly in those wounds associated with burns (9, 10). In contrast, instances of Citrobacter sp. wound infections are uncommon within the literature; however, there are reported instances of their pathogenicity (11, 12). Here, we present the draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PS3 and Citrobacter freundii strain SA79, both of which were isolated from a contaminated wound dressing. A discarded dressing from an infected wound was provided anonymously from a local skin integrity practitioner. Swabs were taken from the wound surface and transferred to 2 mL of sterile maximum recovery diluent (LabM Ltd.) and vortexed. The homogeneous suspension was then used to prepare 400-µL spread plates upon a Pseudomonas aeruginosa selective medium (LAB108, with X107 supplement, LabM, United Kingdom). Single colonies were selected from the plate and purified through further subculture before total genomic DNA was isolated using a commercial kit (Ultraclean Microbial Isolation Kit, Mo-Bio, USA). Draft whole-genome sequences were obtained using a whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequence strategy. Paired-end 125 cycles sequence reads were generated using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 system (BaseClear, Netherlands). FASTQ sequence files were generated using the Illumina Casava pipeline version 1.8.3 and the assembly prepared using CLC Genomics Workbench version 7.0.4. The contigs were linked and placed into scaffolds or supercontigs. The orientation, order, and distance between the contigs was estimated using the insert size between the paired-end and/or mate-pair reads using the SSPACE Premium scaffolder version 2.3 (13). The draft genome sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PS3 generated 165 contigs, with a sequence length of 6,799,547 bp (66.2% G+C content). The draft genome contained a total of 6,161 coding sequences (CDSs), where 35 pseudogenes, 2 genes coding for rRNA (16S, 23S), 57 genes coding for tRNA, and 1 noncoding RNA (ncRNA) were present. Citrobacter freundii strain SA79 was 4,870,483 bp in length across 19 contigs with a G+C content of 51.7%. The draft genome contained a total of 4,480 CDSs, 36 pseudogenes, 3 genes coding for rRNA (5S, 16S, 23S), 72 genes coding for tRNA, and 9 ncRNAs were present. Further analysis of the two genomes using RAST (14) indicated that both organisms carried genes encoding resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds. In addition, the presence of genes involved with exopolysaccharide and biofilm synthesis suggests that these organisms may be of further clinical interest.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

These sequences were submitted to Genbank under the accession numbers JRGP00000000 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PS3) and LAZI00000000 (Citrobacter freundii strain SA79).
  13 in total

Review 1.  Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents.

Authors:  David Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  T F Mah; G A O'Toole
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Katja E Hill; David W Williams; Samuel J Hooper; Dave W Thomas; John W Costerton
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  EWMA document: Antimicrobials and non-healing wounds. Evidence, controversies and suggestions.

Authors:  F Gottrup; J Apelqvist; T Bjarnsholt; T Bjansholt; R Cooper; Z Moore; E J G Peters; S Probst
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 5.  Silver as biocides in burn and wound dressings and bacterial resistance to silver compounds.

Authors:  Simon Silver; Le T Phung; Gregg Silver
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.

Authors:  Rodney M Donlan; J William Costerton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Bacteremias due to Citrobacter diversus and Citrobacter freundii. Incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  V Drelichman; J D Band
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-10

8.  Frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotypes in burn wound infections and their resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  Hamid Karimi Estahbanati; Parnian Pour Kashani; Fahimeh Ghanaatpisheh
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Verotoxinogenic Citrobacter freundii associated with severe gastroenteritis and cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in a nursery school: green butter as the infection source.

Authors:  H Tschape; R Prager; W Streckel; A Fruth; E Tietze; G Böhme
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.